Friday, January 28, 2011

Jane Espenson: Writer, sci-fi thriller, one nerdy lady


(CNN) -- If Jane Espenson were to write a personal profile for an online dating service, it might read something like this:

Motivated, creative woman who is not afraid to confront complicated issues ranging from imagining ways to kill off threatening vampires to interspecies sexual encounters (hey, I don't judge!) seeking like-minded mate who won't mind sharing me with my other passion, writing.

Old enough to remember "Barney Miller" but young enough to be responsible for identifying a fault with a warp drive that was slowly tearing the time-space continuum, heralding the development a new generation warp drive. Food enthusiast and forward thinker.

It's probably not the kind of ad many of her Midwestern childhood friends would identify with, but it's just the kind of credentials that attract suitors in the world of thrilling television series, where executives need to keep the creative flow of ideas coming in order to feed the demand. Jane Espenson is up to it and then some.

Growing up Jane

As writer or co-executive producer of some of the biggest cult science-fiction shows of the past decade, Espenson, 46, gets a sardonic kick out of her job.

"When I was a kid, I really identified with the character of Joe Rossi on 'Lou Grant.' He was this writer who knew he was good, and all the other characters thought he was so obnoxious, but I would watch him at home and think that I wanted to be that: a good writer and proud of it. If I've succeeded, then I've managed to become obnoxious! Heh!"

Born and raised in Iowa, Espenson was the kind of girl who often asked for more homework.

But during non-study moments, shows like "M*A*S*H" and "The Mary Tyler Moore Show" captured her imagination, turning her into a self-proclaimed addict of good television.

She soon wanted to create her own form of entertainment, even if it would take her a while to realize her potential (on shows like "Buffy the Vampire Slayer," "Battlestar Galactica," "Caprica" and "Gilmore Girls," just to name a few.)

As a teenager, Espenson found out that the producers of "M*A*S*H" accepted scripts on spec, without promise of payment or future work. Even though she wasn't an established writer, she set out to write her first episode.

"It was a disaster," she recalled. "I never sent it. I didn't know the correct format. I didn't know the address of where to send it, and then I thought, they can't really hire me until I finish junior high anyway." Jane went on to college at the University of California, Berkeley, honing her skills in computer science and linguistics before being called back by her passion to write.

She read that "Star Trek: The Next Generation" also accepted scripts on spec while she was still in graduate school, at the age of 25, so she tried again.

"I wrote three of them," Espenson said, "and they called me about the second of the three and told me they wanted me to come in and pitch."

She wasn't really sure what that meant, but she went to L.A. anyway to meet with the show's producers and give it her best shot. They ultimately didn't use her story ideas, but they did use one of the premises she put forth.

"The premise was that every time we go to warp speed, we find out we've been tearing the time-space continuum, essentially polluting, and they ending up doing that and even developing a special kind of warp drive we see in later shows."

Espenson's own career didn't hit warp speed immediately, though, and she knew that she had to try multiple entries into the field if she were to succeed. In 1992, she received an ABC Disney writers fellowship. She packed up her things and moved to L.A. but knew she had a lot going against her.

Namely, she was a woman and therefore a buzzkill in the writing room.

"It's like being the one girl in the locker room," Espenson said. "You are simultaneously the beloved little sister and the odd person out."

Espenson had a number of successes in the early '90s as a writer for both comedy and science-fiction. In 1997, she joined the staff of "Ellen" as a writer-producer. It solidified her roots in comedy and helped her learn not to take herself or her situation too seriously.

Success measured in the "Buff"

Espenson learned to make her feminine side work in the male-dominated writing rooms she inhabited for much of the '90s. When she went to work for an animated show called "Dinosaurs," she learned that being different had its advantages.

"There were all the boy writers and me, and it was that way for years," recalled Espenson. "It was a good thing, because I got to watch the whole process."

Although Espenson had amazing experiences on that show, later writing rooms were far more harsh.

"There is a rule where you can say anything in this room, so people try to be as shocking and appalling as they can. That becomes the prize, and a lot of times, that was at my expense," said Espenson, who insists that she has no bad feelings about it. "It's a good education. You learn to roll with it. You become one of the guys, or you become the girl. I tried not to do either of those things."

But she found that being a girl didn't matter nearly as much as having ideas that could sell. She realized that the day she went to get a writing job on a new show called "Buffy the Vampire Slayer."

First came an interview with the show-runner, responsible for the day-to-day running of the series. On "Buffy," it was sci-fi favorite Joss Whedon.

"It was terrifying but lovely," Espenson said.

Whedon ran his show a little differently from others. If you wanted to get hired, you had to pitch something great. So when Espenson threw out her ideas and heard that one of them had just been shot but not released, she knew she had the same mindset.

It was confirmed when someone else who was in the room that day told her that after she'd left, Whedon walked over to a white board and wrote just two words: Hire her.

Fans loved Buffy. The blonde high school student whose extracurricular activity happened to he hunting vampires was a cult hit, and working with Whedon served as a lesson for Espenson in how to stay true to character.

"Joss' credo was that we needed a reason to tell the story. He would ask, 'What's the Buffy of it?' " Espenson recalled. "It's about the journey, and it's her journey, and we kept coming in and pitching stories which were cool and had a great sci-fi hook, but Joss made clear that Buffy needed the emotional hook."

Espenson recalls, in one instance, waiting years until Buffy's right-hand man Xander was ready for an idea she wanted to write for him.

"I remember finding out that Nicholas Brendon, who played Xander, had a twin brother, so I pitched a story on that premise," Espenson said. "But Joss said Xander wasn't ready and held off for three years until it was the right emotional time for that character. He brings that kind of discipline."

"Battlestar" and beyond

When Espenson joined the cast of "Battlestar Galactica" for season four in 2006, she found herself in familiar territory as the only female writer in the room. She worked for Ronald D. Moore, whom she ranks among the best show-runners she's had.

"Ron was wonderful," Espenson said. "His ability to grasp things and know things so quickly and so decisively what will work is amazing. We gather around a cell phone and call him to pitch a story, and he would be in an airport somewhere and would just sit there and listen, and I'm thinking, 'oh, there are so many things we're leaving out.' And he'd just start saying, 'OK, I like it. Here's what you need to do,' and he would start rearranging scenes to make it work."

Espenson went on to become co-executive producer of the show as well as executive producer of the "Battlestar" movie "The Plan."

The experience was enough to whet her appetite for creative control, so when SyFy network executives offered her the job of show-runner for a spinoff called "Caprica," she went for it.

In her own words, it was her biggest mistake.

The job lasted a year, and the show was cancelled last fall. Espenson took it in stride and says she realizes that the demands of being a show-runner stretched her abilities.

As a self-proclaimed control freak, she found that she was controlling all the wrong things. Although she's extremely proud of the show and is happy to launch into praise for those who worked on it with her, it's hard not to notice the rare moment of raw personal reflection that gives insight into the Espenson mind.

"That's exactly why I wasn't a good show-runner," she said. "I'm too honest about my fears, so I just did it again. That's the biggest mistake I've made in this interview."

But don't buy it just yet. Espenson is a woman who knows what she does best.

"I think I'm a really, really good writer, which sounds awful, but I feel strongest when I have my fingers on the keys," Espenson said. "Projecting confidence and having the whole big vision thing in your head and knowing how to balance other things, that is all stuff I never bothered to learn."

She hasn't written off the idea of running another show some day, but she freely admits that next time, she'd do it differently.

"I think there's a way to run a show when you learn how to delegate the bits you don't do well," she says. "I'd do it again if it were the right project, but this time I'd have more partners around me."

Right now, it's not bad being Jane.

She's writing for "Torchwood" on Starz while working on a SyFy pilot titled "Good Cop, Dead Cop."

And she keeps interesting company. She had dinner with her old friend Joss Whedon and a bunch of other colleagues not long ago. They sat in a California restaurant and talked about the latest round of "Buffy" comic books while tossing around ideas for things to come.

Ah, if one could only imagine ...

CNN

10 Best Vampires Movies

These 10 Best Vampire Movies are from a time long, long before the onslaught of Stephanie Meyer. The Twilight saga has given vampires a bad rap. These vampire classics remind us of a time when vampires weren't angsty teens who sparkled.

   1. "Interview with a Vampire." Tom Cruise, Brad Pitt, and a very young Kirsten Dunst star in this 1994 rendition of Anne Rice's novel. A reporter gets the chance of a lifetime: to interview a real-life bloodsucking vampire.

   2. "Salem's Lot." While Stephen King's 1979 TV miniseries may not technically be a vampire movie, it set the bar for modern-day vampire stories.

   3. "Nosferatu." This 1922 movie is the oldest on our list and, some say, the greatest vampire movie of all time. This silent chiller stars Max Schreck as the rodent-like Nosferatu.

   4. "Dracula." This 1931 horror classic is the quintessential vampire movie. Bela Lugosi's performance as Dracula cemented his status as a classic horror legend.

   5. "Bram Stoker's Dracula." The 1992 remake by Francis Ford Coppola stayed true to Bram Stoker's horror novel of the same name. Gary Oldman, Anthony Hopkins, and Winona Ryder all headlined this film that won three Oscars for Best Costumes, Best Makeup, and Best Effects.

   6. "Buffy the Vampire Slayer." Who says all vampire movies must be serious? Criticize this choice all you want, but the 1992 cult classic launched a generation of vampire-lovers thanks to Joss Whedon's popular TV series of the same name.

   7. "30 Days of Night." This 2007 film starred Josh Hartnett and imagined what would happen to a stranded Alaskan town if it was attacked by a terrifying unit of hungry, sharp-fanged vampires.

   8. "Blade." You knew it was coming. "Blade" is one of the most famous unconventional vampire movies of all time. Wesley Snipes stars as a half-vampire, half-man set on eradicating evil vampires in this 1998 action movie.

   9. "The Lost Boys." If you want a little 80's cheesiness with your vampire movies, you can't go wrong with this 1987 movie that featured both Corey Haim and Corey Feldman. Dianne Wiest and Kiefer Sutherland also star.

  10. "From Dusk 'Til Dawn." "Quentin Tarantino" should really be a movie genre all its own. With Tarantino writing and acting in this vampire flick, you know it's going to be a campy gorefest. Roger Rodriguez directed this film that starred Hollywood greats like George Clooney, Salma Hayak, Juliette Lewis, and Harvey Keitel.

Screen Junkies

Thursday, January 27, 2011

Sarah Michelle Gellar to TV as twins


Sarah Michelle Gellar fans will be seeing double when the actress returns to TV this year -- she has signed up to play twins in an edgy new show.

The former "Buffy The Vampire Slayer" star has stepped out of the spotlight over the last few years, taking a break to look after her daughter, Charlotte, her first child with husband Freddie Prinze, Jr. Charlotte was born in 2009.

Gellar is now set to make her small screen return in her first major TV role since her time on the vampire show came to an end back in 2003. She will take on two roles in new thriller "The Ringer," playing estranged twins with very different personalities.

The show's producer, Peter Traugott, tells EW.com, "It's an edgy thriller about redemption and about revenge. There's a point of view of two twin sisters who grew apart over a tragedy in their past. And one now seeks redemption and the other one seeks revenge. The sister who is seeking redemption has had a much more troubled life. When her fancy pants sister disappears, she takes over her life. She's living the life of her more successful sister only to come to find out that her life is equally as fraught with danger and complication. Her sister dies in a boating accident. The other sister takes on her persona, only to come to find out that they have a hit out on her."

Gellar will play both parts, with one sister appearing mostly in flashbacks.

SF Gate

Mission Viejo actress returns for movie premiere


Actress Kristy Swanson, a Mission Viejo native, returns to Orange County to attend the premeire of her latest movie "What if..." which opened Jan. 21 at the Rancho Niguel 8 in Laguna Niguel. Here, Swanson shares a laugh with the audience.

Actress Kristy Swanson, a native of Mission Viejo, returned to Orange County to attend the premiere of her latest movie "What if..." which opened last Friday at the Rancho Niguel 8 in Laguna Niguel.

Swanson, who starred in the movie "Buffy the Vampire Slayer," held a brief meet-and-greet prior to the show and followed up with autographs and discussion after the movie. Dozens of friends, family and well wishers attended the screening to support the actress.

OC Register

Marti Noxon Talks “Fright Night”

The Buffy The Vampire scribe was one of the writers on I AM NUMBER FOUR, which comes out February 18, but the film horror fans want to hear her chat about is FRIGHT NIGHT. Noxon scripted the remake, which comes out August 19 and stars Anton Yelchin, Colin Farrell, David Tenant and Christopher Mintz-Plasse.

Collider spoke with Noxon, a writer and producer who works in both film and television, and here are a few of the things she had to say about FRIGHT NIGHT.

When Noxon was offered the scripting chores, a pair of jumping off points got her rolling on the redux. “Yeah, there were two things,” she says. “One was that I’d been thinking about Vegas for a setting for a while, for a supernatural story. Because of the mortgage crisis, in some of those suburbs out there, every third or fourth house is vacant and it has this really eerie, ghost town feel. And then, on top of that, I was like, ‘God, if I were a vampire, nobody would know because everybody sleeps during the day and works at night. This would just be an awesome place for monsters!’ So, I had already started rolling that around in my head. It gets really dark, and it’s a place for sin and excess, and people go missing a lot. I was like, ‘I wish I were a vampire. I would so move here!’ When I heard they were thinking about doing the remake, I immediately thought, ‘Well, that would be an awesome movie to set in Las Vegas.’ It has that Spielberg-ian, suburb vibe and that Amblin feeling to it. You’ve got that, superficially, but then underneath that, something is really wrong. That, I immediately went to.

“And then, the second thing was that I went back and looked at the original movie and was like, ‘Why are these guys [Charley and Evil Ed] friends? What happened there?’ They never explain it. It felt like there were just big things cut out. I thought there was stuff that was indicated, but not explored. So, a big part of the movie is the relationship between Charley Brewster [Yelchin] and Evil Ed [Mintz-Plasse]. Thematically, it definitely became a question of, ‘What kind of man do you want to be?’ Charley forsakes his old friendships ’cause he’s momentarily cool. That was a huge touchstone.”

OK, enough with the character-oriented stuff, how scary and gory is the film going to be? “It’s intense,” she replies. ”It has a lot of intense moments, but it’s not very gory. It’s pretty close to the original, but maybe a little bit scarier just ’cause it’s a little more grounded. It’s not quite as over-the-top."

Fangoria

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

Sarah Michelle Gellar - Sarah Michelle Gellar Could Return To Play Twin Sisters


26 January 2011

Sarah Michelle Gellar, the American actress best known for appearing in the long running drama series 'Buffy The Vampire Slayer', could return to television to play twin sisters in a new Cbs show titled 'Ringer', reports Entertainment Weekly. The show is currently in development and a pilot episode is expected to be filmed in May.

Although Gellar has been cast in the show, the drama is yet to be commissioned and a decision will be made after the pilot episode airs later this year. The actress was expected to appear in the much-anticipated Hbo series 'The Wonderful Maladys', but the show never made it past the pilot stage. Producer PETER TRAUGOTT confirmed that the "edgy thriller" will follow the story of two twin sisters who grow apart over a tragedy in their past. He also confirmed that Gellar would play the role of both twin sisters and added, "The sister who is seeking redemption has had a much more troubled life. When her fancy pants sister disappears, she takes over her life. She's living the life of her more successful sister".

The actress has struggled to land major roles since leaving 'Buffy' and her last television role came when she voiced a character on the animated series "American Dad' last year. In 2009, she appeared in the straight-to-dvd movie titled 'Veronika Decides to Die'.


Contact Music

Tuesday, January 25, 2011

Joss Whedon talks about the end of the 'Buffy the Vampire Slayer' Season 8 comic, and the future of Season 9


by Adam B. Vary

The acclaimed (oc)cult TV show Buffy the Vampire Slayer went off the air in 2003 after seven seasons. But for nearly four years, Buffy’s story has lived on in creator Joss Whedon’s “Season 8″ comic book series, which finishes its 40-issue run today. Whoa, boy, did things go down. (WARNING: Some big time spoilers follow, for both “Season 8″ and the impending “Season 9.” Consider yourself warned now.) Over the course of the “season,” Buffy became a god, battled (and boinked) her ex Angel, and watched him kill her mentor Giles. And then she effectively destroyed the seed of all magic on earth. Issue No. 40 deals with the aftermath, and — as Whedon makes clear in his exclusive Q&A with EW — it also gives some pointed hints for what to expect in Buffy “Season 9.” Whedon also talks about his new comic series about Angel with publisher Dark Horse, some of his controversial plot turns in “Season 8″ — Buffy goes lesbian? Xander and Dawn get domestic? — and what actor Anthony Stewart Head’s reaction was when Whedon told him his character Rupert Giles was going to bite the big one.

ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY: So no more magic, huh?
JOSS WHEDON: [Chuckles] Well, let’s not use hyperbole. No more magic in the sense of not so much entirely convenient magic. I wanted to play with the idea of the world dimming a little bit. Possibly because that’s how I feel about it, or at least this country in the last 10 years. And I wanted to do a little bit of a reset, where things seem more back down to earth. I got very excited when I had a comic book with the idea that I could do absolutely anything. We hit a lot of beautiful notes and I’ve got a lot of great writers working [on the comics], and I’m very proud of it. But at the same time, it’s like, yeah, “You can do anything” is not really the Buffy mission statement. The Buffy mission statement is, “What does this feel like?” So I wanted to bounce it back a little bit to the real world.

Issue No. 40 is clearly setting up Season 9, and makes it seem like it is going to be far more human-scaled.
It will be more like the television show. With the comic, we just sort of said, “Wheee!” Ultimately, “Wheee!” caught up with us in a cavalcade of mythology. It became clear, as it did with the show, that people really liked when Buffy’s adventures reflect what she’s going through in her life [and] what we’re going through in our lives at that age. That was the thing in season 8 that we didn’t tap into as much as I think we ultimately should have.

You did seem to touch on that idea when you, essentially, made Buffy a god with her own idyllic world, and she pretty much rejected it right off the bat.
Yeah. I feel like we’re true to the characters. It was just that very basic mission statement of, “You know what, I’m going through this, too.” Not a lot of people are leading armies. Buffy, part of her charm is that the fact that, outside the mystical world, she was nobody. And it was interesting to put her in that power position and to play on that grand scale. But ultimately, I think the fans more enjoy her when she is the little underdog and not the little overlord.

Not that anybody who’s a Buffy fan should be that shocked that you did this at this point, but Joss, you killed Giles.
Yeah, I did. I did. I have several reasons for that, some of which I can’t reveal because ripples from that event are going to be a part of both [the Buffy "Season 9" comic and the new Angel comic]. Part of it was really just feeling that Giles’ place in the comic book did not sit the way it did in the show. To have this paternal, expositional guy there — it wasn’t really something that played in the comics the way it did when Tony Head [i.e. actor Anthony Stewart Head] does it. I wanted to make all this matter and have something that would send emotional ripples through all the characters. Also, I’m a prick. But I did tell Tony it was going to happen before it did. At first he said, “Oooh,” a little worried. Then I said, “Angel’s gonna kill you.” He said, all excited, “Oooh! That’s great!” [Laughs]

Perhaps the other most controversial choice you made was to enter Buffy into a lesbian relationship. For some fans, that did seem to come oddly out of left field.
You know, I didn’t hear any real objection to that. But I don’t go trolling on websites for people that don’t like me. I’m very fragile, like an egg. We had talked about the idea of Buffy having a lesbian fling as one of the things that does actually reflect where she is in her life, if you consider the events in “Season 8″ to be her college experience. It’s that time in your life where that might happen. We just slammed right into it with a splash page, instead of tenuously inching towards it. And that was largely [writer] Drew Goddard’s call. He said, “You know what? It would obvious to start building toward this, and then seeing that play out, how that would be. I think in a lot of these situations, it just kind of happens, and then you deal with it.” It’s more interesting and it gives us a better opportunity to face the reality of a situation like that.

You also had Xander and Dawn ultimately become a romantic item, and you outed vampires to the world. It seems like you wanted to advance the story in a really meaningful, significant way on a lot of fronts.
You can’t just sit around and spin your wheel with these guys. The show lasted on the idea that people are constantly changing. What makes them interesting? So, is Willow destined to go dark? How is that future going to unfold? Who is in love with whom? Who can’t be with whom? That’s part of what makes their interaction rich. It’s not just, “We’re clever and funny, the murder is solved.” It’s just not the way I write. It was still very clear to me that Xander and Dawn were going to end up together by the very start [of Season 8]. And actually, I was surprised that anybody was surprised. All their interactions were so tight, and occasionally weirdly physical. It was all pointing there. He tried to have a relationship with somebody else, but some prick killed her.

You mentioned earlier about getting into a bit of trouble thanks to the freedom that comic books afforded you. But what was your favorite “We could never do this on the TV show” moment?
I gotta go with giant Dawn. I loved giant Dawn so much, absolutely more than the readers, but I didn’t care. The idea that Dawn becomes a giant and all the permutations of that, some of which we didn’t even get to do, that was such a delight for me. It just absolutely fit in the universe. It was the right kind of problem for Dawn to have.

On the penultimate page of issue No. 40, there’s a guy in John Lennon glasses who looks fairly evil. Am I right in thinking he’s new? Or am I just not remembering him from season 8?
He’s a new guy. I can’t tell you about him. But you are not wrong to say you don’t remember him, because he has not appeared yet. He has yet to come.

In the Fray storyline from “Season 8″ — in which Buffy got sucked into the world of your spin-off comic about a slayer living far into the future — we met Dark Willow again, and we seem to be heading in that direction the way we left Willow at the end of “Season 8.”
Well, maybe. It’s a question we’re holding out there right now: Is that her destiny? Can she get her powers back? This idea of magic being taken out of the world — that’s going to be her personal obsession and will result in a miniseries. She can have center stage for a while. Whether or not that means that’ll send her to become the evil Fray’d version of herself is something we’re going to dangle.

Finally, all due respect to the amazing artists who drew the comic and did the covers, but do you ever miss having the actors to bring these stories to life?
I do. Particularly, as I said before, in the case of Giles. Tony has this cool sexuality that just doesn’t come on the page when he’s saying, [in a British accent] “Oh, this book says blah blah blah.” It’s hard to capture some of the stuff that the actors bring. Tony is astonishing. I can’t speak highly enough of how artist Georges Jeanty captured their likenesses, but still made it look like a comic book and not like balloon heads on hastily drawn panels. And the way he captured Buffy was really lovely. But yeah, you hear [the characters] so well, sometimes it’s like they’re there. It is frustrating at times. You’re like, “Why can’t they just be there? Let’s get the whole gang back together again.”

For more on Joss Whedon and the future of the Buffyverse — including how Whedon really feels about the recently announced plans for a Buffy reboot movie without his involvement — check out this week’s issue of Entertainment Weekly, on newsstands Friday, Jan. 21.

Shelf Life

Whedon discusses the end of Buffy Season 8, drops hints about Season 9

Posted on January 19, 2011 - 11:00 AM by Kevin Melrose

With the release today of Buffy the Vampire Slayer #40, the conclusion of the sprawling Season 8 storyline, creator Joss Whedon says he’s already looking forward to a more “down to earth” Season 9.

“I got very excited when I had a comic book with the idea that I could do absolutely anything,” he tells Etertainment Weekly‘s Shelf Life blog. “We hit a lot of beautiful notes and I’ve got a lot of great writers working [on the comics], and I’m very proud of it. But at the same time, it’s like, yeah, ‘You can do anything’ is not really the Buffy mission statement. The Buffy mission statement is, ‘What does this feel like?’ So I wanted to bounce it back a little bit to the real world.”

Be warned: The interview contains spoilers for Season 8, so if you’ve been picking up the collected editions, you’ll probably want to avoid that link.

Buffy the Vampire Slayer will relaunch late this year, coinciding with the return of Angel to Dark Horse. The publisher has said that the new season will be “a little tighter, a little more concise” than Season 8, which took nearly four years to complete.

Related: Dark Horse has a list of retailers who are marking Buffy Summers’ birthday — it’s today! — with special events.

Comic Book Resources

Buffy Season Eight in Review

25 Jan 2011 01:19 PM

by Drew Kolar, Staff Writer

It took nearly four years—40 issues, three one-shots, eight story arcs and a ton of drama—but the end is finally here. As of January 19, Buffy the Vampire Slayer’s season eight comic series has reached its conclusion, which is both optimistic and heartbreaking.

Generally known to go out with a bang, it seems Joss Whedon has backtracked a bit, ending issue 40 with a return to simpler times, when it was just vampires versus slayers—one slayer. After putting an end to the world’s magic, Buffy is pretty much left on her own, with everybody else feeling betrayed by her last-minute choice. There are, of course, stores to tell in season nine-whenever that is set in motion-but for now, we’ve come to a pretty anticlimactic close.

Let me start by getting one thing straight: I’m a die-hard Buffy fan for life, so it’s pretty much impossible to give an unbiased opinion. Of course with Buffy, is it ever really possible to be unbiased? As with any great TV show, it’s all about the characters and the investment we put into their lives, as though they’re our best friends or, more so, reflections of ourselves.

Comic book enthusiasts may say that the likenesses weren’t always true to form (Dawn never really looked much like Michelle Trachtenberg, but Georges Jeanty always had the Sarah Michelle Gellar nose right on point), while TV show fans argue that the gaps between issues were too long and the over-the-top story arcs were nowhere near faithful. With Joss’s “unlimited” budget and ability to do crazy things, it’s no wonder why he chose to change the world, sending the cast to majestic locations and bringing back pretty much every character ever created. However, it’s really all about the story and Buffy’s self-discovery and fragility.

For many, the story ended with the destruction of Sunnydale in the final episode. Buffy and friends are left wondering what to do next, though their slayer army-building is alluded to in Angel’s fifth season. The comics then follow up on these events and clear up any confusion that may have been brought up on Angel—Buffy is a full-fledged general of an army of slayers, still fighting the good fight and looking for the next “big bad.” Oh, and she’s not dating “The Immortal”—that was a decoy. By the end, it definitely becomes a new monster in both story and style, like the time Buffy gained superpowers comparable to most comic book heroes in order to have sex with a superpowered Angel to create a new universe—yep, that happened.

Maybe it’s ridiculous. Maybe Joss took his girl way too far beyond the readers’ comfort zone. There were moments that had me questioning my own fandom, wondering why I was still reading and if I should consider this part of the real story or just filler until he or Fox decided to make a movie (and not just a crappy reboot starring a young newcomer like Taylor Momsen). Of course, in his letter to the fans at the end of the comic, he acknowledges these concerns.

“I was so excited to finally have an unlimited budget that I wanted to make the book an epic,” he says, “but I realized along the way that the things I loved the best were the things you loved the best: the peeps. The down-to-earth, recognizable people. And Mecha-Dawn. (She has a tail!)”

Through all the superpowers, renegade slayers, time traveling, Dawn’s transformations, Harmony’s rise to fame, the Buffyverse’s acknowledgement of the actual vampire craze in pop culture, high-flying sex antics, major deaths and ultimate betrayal, it really does come down to the story—the people. Say what you will about how much Joss has changed his universe beyond repair, but just remember the fun times we had watching the show, arguing about plotlines and discussing whether Buffy should be with Angel or Spike (I vote Spike).

In whole, the comics sparked just as many debates and controversies as any episode. Isn’t that all we can ask for? Isn’t that all we can hope for—a world to help us escape ours and characters to relate to? Buffy has always been about hope and carrying on through hard times, and the final issue, however sad it may be, still has that small glimmer. Buffy lives, my friends. Buffy lives.

All Media NY

Eliza Dushku Named This Year's Hottest Babe in Horror!


Tuesday, January 18, 2011

The Piranha 3D (now on DVD and Blu-ray everywhere) sponsored "Hottest Babes in Horror" playoffs have come to an end with the stunning 30-year-old Eliza Dushku coming from behind to defeat goddess Diora Baird. Most moviegoers probably know Dushku best as spunky "bad girl" Missy Pantone in fluffy cheerleader movie Bring It On, but horror fans will always remember her for her role in 2003's underrated backwoods slasher flick Wrong Turn, which had the olive-skinned sexpot running around in a clingy white tank top for the duration. Since then she's remained close to the genre, by parlaying her television success as the rebellious "Faith" on "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" into roles in two "horror-adjacent" Fox series, "Tru Calling" and Joss Whedon's "Dollhouse". More recently she has taken lead roles in strictly B-level fare like serial murderer flick The Alphabet Killer and "killer board game" movie Open Graves, and will next appear in the recently-announced horror-thriller Zoe with Freddie Prinze Jr. and James van der Beek.

Bloody Disgusting

Sunday, January 23, 2011

The End of Buffy: Season 8


January 19, 2011

Editor Scott Allie discusses the finale to Season 8 and what is still to come in Season 9.

Few segments of geekdom are as devoted to their obsession as fans of Buffy the Vampire Slayer. These fans cried out in pain when Buffy and its companion series Angel went off the air. And they celebrated when Dark Horse chose to continue beyond the end of these two shows with Buffy the Vampire Slayer: Season 8. The saga of Buffy and the Scooby gang has unfolded over the course of nearly four years, 40 issues, and multiple writers. And now, with the release of Buffy the Vampire Slayer Season 8 #40, that saga comes to a close.

To mark the ending of this mammoth undertaking, we chatted with editor Scott Allie via e-mail. Allie shared his thoughts on co-writing the final arc with Whedon, the complicated relationship between Buffy and Angel, and bidding farewell to several popular characters.

But fans needn't worry about the future of the franchise. Dark Horse is already prepping Buffy: Season 9 and a new Angel series for later this year. We also asked Allie more about what the publisher has in store for these new books.

IGN Comics: Your name name is credited along with Joss Whedon's for the scripts in "Last Gleaming". How would you describe the writing arrangement on this arc? How does it compare to Joss' previous efforts on the series?

Scott Allie: We worked really closely together on the outline, then I went off and wrote scripts, sometimes in pieces, and ran them by him. He gave me notes, sometimes extensive, sometimes light, and then the book was drawn. When it was time to letter, he'd first go over the script and polish the dialogue in places. I think this was similar to arcs that other writers wrote, except that he generally gave them dialogue notes before it was drawn. So it was at least as hands on as with those other writers, but not the same as him writing the arc himself.

IGN Comics: Presumably Joss had a fairly comprehensive outline for Season 8 when work began. How much have plans for the series evolved over time? Is the series ending differently from how you originally planned?

Allie: The big picture is exactly the same, but a lot of details changed. We knew from the get-go that Angel was Twilight and that this would mean the end of magic, the ultimate betrayal being betraying oneself. We knew she'd get super powers, but didn't know exactly how that would come across—it was a little more like a superhero story, with Brad at the helm. Lots of details changed. At one point Warren and Amy were going to kill each other, but we got jazzed about the idea of Warren liquefying when the magic ended.

IGN Comics: "Last Gleaming" is easily the most densely packed arc of the series. Have there been any unique challenges putting this final story together?

Allie: It was the end, and we had to tie down everything we could, so that was different than previous arcs. There were a lot of plot threads in this thing, and we did not sew it all up, but the effort to do that, to decide how much we were going to do, that took a lot of figuring. And the death of Giles thing, that was the only time we kept a secret from the other people on the creative team.

IGN Comics: Issue #39 featured several major character deaths. Was it hard dispatching fan favorites like Giles and Andrew? How have the fans been reacting to these events?

Allie: Wait, who killed Andrew!? No, Andrew didn't die. Are you thinking of Warren? Andrew just got knocked out. And everyone hates Warren, so that was easy, and sort of fun, and hopefully funny. But Giles. Yeah, that was not good. We all felt sick. There were long talks. Whedonesque threw up some kind of funeral announcement and closed the site for a day in memory. Tony Head has recently commented on the comic, and that was a relief. In that his comment was not that I ruined this or that, as some of the fans have said.

IGN Comics: Which character do you feel has shown the most interesting growth and evolution over the course of these last few years?

Allie: I'd say Xander. I think he's matured, settled into himself. I was pretty excited to see him rebuff Buffy like he did, when she tried to steal him out from under Dawn. Oh, no, wait, it was Faith. She's grown the most. Not just in this season, but over the course of Seasons 7 & 8 she's become something better than she was. She's still vulnerable when it comes to Buffy, but she's a much more mature person than she was on the Angel show, and before that. I'm excited to see her evolution continue.

IGN Comics: What can readers expect from issue #40? Does it serve as an epilogue to "Last Gleaming" or are there still more trials ahead for our heroes?

Allie: I didn't write this one, it's all Joss, and so you know there are arduous trials in store for the kids. It is epilogue, to the whole season, but in doing that, it shows what her life is like after the dust settles. And there are challenges, which will get worse in the next issue …

IGN Comics: How would you characterize the relationship between Buffy and Angel in the aftermath of this big battle? Are they back to being antagonists?

Allie: Gotta wait for #40. I like what Joss did, don't want to do anything to diminish it.

IGN Comics: Jo Chen's cover to issue #40 forms an obvious parallel with issue #1. Will there be other parallels drawn in the story itself?

Allie: Yeah, very much so. And, in odd ways, other key moments in the characters' histories. The Joss issues are always the best, in particular the standalone issues. I'm happy that some readers would disagree, because it's a shame when there's only one choice for best story … but for me, his are the best, and this is a great one to go out on.

IGN Comics: What can you reveal about Season 9 right now as far as premise, creative team, and structure? Can we expect other Season 8 writers to return, such as Brian K. Vaughan or Brad Meltzer?

Allie: Some Season 8 writers will return, but there will be important new members of the team. We're all getting together in a week to work on the story, and things will be a bit more solidified there. But it will be very different from Season 8, in important ways, including how it's put together.

IGN Comics: Will the Buffy comic and the new Angel series co-exist in the same way the two TV shows did when they were on the air?

Allie: I'd kind of say moreso, but not that Buffy and Angel themselves will be crossing over all the time. Maybe not at all. They'll need a break, but in other ways, the two titles will have connections the shows did not. And one publisher, instead of two networks.

IGN Comics: Can readers expect any other Buffy projects in the gap between Seasons 8 and 9? Are there any other one-shot specials in the pipeline like the Willow and Riley specials?

Allie: There will be something bite-size between seasons, but nothing major. There's really not that much time. Six months, I think? It'll take that long just to rev this engine back up, man.

IGN Comics: WB has been showing some interest in producing a Buffy the Vampire Slayer reboot not tied to the current Buffy universe and continuity. Should that movie materialize, would you have an interest in producing comics set in that universe in the same way IDW publishes G.I. Joe books set in various universes?

Allie: Shit, look what DC does with Batman, that's no more unified a continuity or approach than IDW's various Joe books, is it? That's totally cool, and a valid way of presenting your characters. And Disney's got that new, edgy, Breaking Bad-style version of Mickey Mouse on Disney After Dark, which I'm looking forward to. But that's different than saying, Hey Joss, let's work really carefully with you to do an official, canonical continuation of your iconic female character … plus we're also gonna do this other thing over here that you've been wicked polite about. Who knows, though, maybe they'll work something out with him.

IGN

Thursday, January 20, 2011

Happy Birthday, Buffy!

By Ann Hoevel, CNN
January 19, 2011

If you're not already celebrating at your local comic book store or glued to Oxygen's 10-hour marathon of "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" re-runs, then maybe you don't know.

Today is Buffy Anne Summers' 30th birthday.

"Buffy the Vampire Slayer" has survived through one feature length film, a cult television series and a comic book. Still a fan favorite and no stranger to controversy, Joss Whedon's influential franchise about a teenage girl who just happened to be naturally good at killing vampires is still inspiring fans.

Buffy's birthday is reason for them to celebrate. There was a moment in the episode "The Gift," which aired in 2001, when fans certainly didn't think this powerful girl would make it to 30.

That's because Buffy took a swan-dive into a magical vortex from hell and died. At the end of the episode her gravestone is shown, marking her life from 1981 until 2001 with the epitaph, "She saved the world a lot." (She was resurrected the next season, when the show moved from the now defunct WB network to UPN.)

Few who are aware of the "Buffyverse" would argue with that. Buffy saved the world from plenty of "big bads," like vampires, demons and witches, but she did something pretty heroic for the people who tuned in every week to watch her adventures, too.

"(The show) really brought a lot of nerdy girls out of their shell," said Andrea Carlson, 27, a dedicated Buffy fan who works for the state of Minnesota.

"It did make it more acceptable to be a female who was into more unconventional sides of society. And I think a lot of guys were suddenly like, 'Hey, these nerd girls are really cute!' Instead of just being the best friend, now we're more accepted as almost sex symbols, thanks to that show."

"Buffy is the sexy, hot chick that's always slaying everything, but the fact that she has her smart sidekick -- always with the laptop, always researching, I think (the show) did a lot to show that there's more than one type of girl," said Janeka Rector, a 32 year old die-hard Buffy fan who works at the University of Texas at Austin as a development specialist.

Series writer and "Buffy" comic book contributor Jane Espenson agreed. She said the show's central characters (who referred to themselves as the "Scooby Gang") gave overt nerdyness "a lovely coating of coolness and acceptance."

Fans and critics often wondered how a man like Whedon could portray the trials and tribulations of being a teenage girl so accurately.

"We are definitely in tune with our feminine side," said "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" comic book artist Georges Jeanty of his collaboration with Whedon. "I don't think it's so much a respect for women, but it's just the acceptance of a human being."

Jeanty said Whedon broke the stereotype of helpless, attractive girls in horror movies with "Buffy."

"He just thought, what if, once the monster did catch up to the blond girl who was screaming and running away into the alley, what if that girl then turned around and really started kicking some ass?"

Espenson sees characters like "Battlestar Gallactica's" (a sci-fi television show for which she also wrote) Boomer and Starbuck as homages to "Buffy," as well as "Torchwood's" Gwen Cooper.

But attractive actors and strong female characters aren't the only reasons fans continue to follow the franchise.

"You can find certain things in the characters that you, personally, can identify with," said Kim Frum, a public relations expert for the Maryland state highway system and another Buffy fan.

"Some days I'm having a "Willow" day and other days I'm having a "Xander" day where nothing goes right, I'm a complete klutz and I'm getting knocked in the head all the time," she said.

"Some days I just want to fall out laughing, and I know exactly where to go back to and watch a certain scene. It's still fun to watch even if you know the entire series by heart."

Other fans are rewatching the series and blogging about every episode.

Another professed fan of "Buffy" is actress and writer Whit Anderson. She's been handed the reins to a Warner Bros. "Buffy" re-boot movie (Warner Bros., like CNN, is owned by Time Warner), which has fans and Whedon's cohorts scratching their heads.

Whedon is not involved with the upcoming feature film, and addressed the fact in an open letter on E! online in November 2010.

"Buffy is very personal for me," Espenson said, "but really I'm just part of a big machine that exists to allow Joss to realize his vision. If there is work being done that isn't being guided by Joss, then I don't really see that as related to what I do."

"I'm dubious about her," said Rector. "Maybe she's like the best writer ever, and she (is writing) something so amazing and clever that we will all sit in awe and forgive her, but it's really, really hard to think of 'Buffy' without Joss Whedon."

"I don't know what she's done before," Dark Horse comics writer and editor Scott Allie said. "I think it's kind of lame. People are restarting franchises every five minutes. Restarts are overlapping at this point."

"It's weird when the guy that made (Buffy) up and is still really personally involved in the character, for somebody else to say, 'Well, we have this technicality that allows us to do this, so we're gonna go re-boot,' " he said.

Perhaps one reason why a re-boot seems strange to fans and franchise creators alike is that Whedon is still actively telling the "Buffy" story. In March 2007, Whedon started the eighth season of "Buffy" with Dark Horse Comics.

To commemorate her fictional 30th birthday, the last issue of "Buffy Season 8" is in stores January 19.

Buffy isn't necessarily 30 in the comics, Jeanty said, adding that the comic book medium allows time to move a little differently than in a television show.

Jeanty speculated that as of today's issue, Buffy is still around 26 years old.

"We can have armies fighting, which would have been really hard to pull off in the show," Allie said. "Our ability to do monsters that aren't just, like, a tall guy in a rubber suit, we embrace."

Allie said a special effects budget with the Dark Horse version of "Buffy" is never an issue; they're only limited by what they can draw.

Plenty of action has happened in "Season 8." Willow returned from her self-imposed exile, Oz showed up on a mountaintop in Tibet, Buffy had a sexy tryst with one of the girls she trains to slay vampires, Angel proved to be a diabolical villain and -- oh yeah -- Giles dies.

Allie assures CNN that Buffy has plenty more adventures left. "Season 9" is already in the works.

"I was down in LA this weekend. We had a writer's summit to talk about Season 9, and (Whedon) is so personally invested in this character," Allie said.

"Because he's busy with 'The Avengers,' we had laid out this proposal for how we would do Season 9 where he had to do relatively little work. Because we were trying to be pragmatic, we want to do the book, we want to keep it going, we want to follow his vision, but we want to give him room to go do this other thing and come back.

"But we're not going to do that, because he was like, 'well what if we do this other thing?' and the ideas are pouring out (of Joss Whedon) about where to take her next," Allie said. "He loves this girl, he loves her. He created her because he wants her to exist."

CNN

Wednesday, January 19, 2011

Buffy The Vampire Slayer #40: The End of Season 8 Is Here [Review]


Jan 19th 2011 By: Chris Murphy

It's now January 2011, almost nineteen years since the Buffy the Vampire Slayer movie that got the franchise off to a rough start and almost fourteen since the beginning of the television series that eventually got it all right. Now Season 8 of the life-after-TV-show Buffy comic book wraps up this week, a book that has had its ups and downs, its moments of brilliance and its confused stumbles, but ultimately ends strongly with issue 40. Wrapping up the "Last Gleaming" arc, creator Joss Whedon finishes things off alongside artist Georges Jeanty with a story that straddles the line between Season 8 and the upcoming Season 9, tying up a few loose ends and introducing hints at new complications to come.

SPOILERS FOLLOW. THIS IS YOUR LAST CHANCE TO STOP READING BEFORE WITNESSING SECRETS NOT MEANT FOR HUMAN EYES (THAT HAVE NOT YET READ ALL OF SEASON EIGHT AND WOULD PREFER TO DO THAT FIRST)

My feelings on Season 8 have been mixed: It started strong, with good early arcs by Whedon and Brian K. Vaughan, but around the halfway point of the series, with the plotlines involving the growing popularity of vampires, the fight between the Slayer army and the military, Buffy's new superpowers, and the apocalyptic attack by demons from another dimension, the series' writing began to feel increasingly disconnected and the scale of events pulled the focus away from the characters.

As a television series, Buffy had always led with its characters and let the plot take a supporting role, but without the actors present to create a feeling of consistency from writer to writer, as a comic Buffy felt precariously close to slipping into the mainstream conventions of its new medium. Brad Meltzer's massive battles between Twilight's military forces and Buffy's army of slayers sometimes felt too much like a big Marvel event, with page after page of impressive fight scene after impressive fight scene. And Whedon's last arc couldn't shake that, with its reality-in-the-balance demon invasion, a scope so massive it sometimes felt more like a DC Crisis than an episode of Buffy.

When I finished issue 39 I was on the verge of deciding to stop following the series, but thought I would read issue 40, see what sense of finality it offered, and let it go. Instead I found that the final issue of Season 8 moved the series back in the direction I had been missing, by skipping ahead in time to a point after Buffy has saved the world yet again through her destruction of the seed at the end of the last issue, sending the demons back to their own dimension came at a great price.

As a result Buffy destroys all magic in the world, taking away her superpowers, all of Willow's powers, and preventing the creation of any new slayers. And so Buffy is left waiting tables in a coffee shop while all of her friends start to push her away. She sleeps on a couch in Xander and Dawn's apartment in San Francisco, which is a bit awkward with the sex Xander and Dawn are now having several feet and a thin wall away. Willow angrily blames Buffy for destroying magic, setting her up as an antagonist for next season. Faith is all the way over in England, carrying on Giles' legacy, and Angel is practically catatonic after killing Giles under the influence of Twilight. Spike can't hang out because he has to fly in a spaceship piloted by bugs, because as much as issue 40 is back to being a character piece it can't shake off all the quirks the series has picked up in comics. On top of all that, the army of Slayers has abandoned Buffy, even forsaking the term "slayer" out of anger over the price Buffy paid to save the world.

All of which means Buffy's left at the end of Season 8 mostly on her own, with no great army to command, fighting vampires with her strength and her wits and trying not to let her few remaining friends down again. That's actually an intriguing setup to Season 9, because the idea of Buffy making difficult decisions about what price is worth paying to save everything and then having to live with the consequences could make for great reading. Particularly when contrasted to the fact that she was given with the choice to sacrifice all of her friends and live in paradise with Angel, she didn't, and now even though they're (mostly) not dead, very few are grateful.

But it's worth stopping to note that if the best thing I have to say about the end of Season 8 is that it's got me looking forward to Season 9, what does that really say about Season 8 itself? Throughout this book's run the question of "Was this really necessary?" has been hovering around the back of my head. I'm going to paraphrase a recent column by Chris Sims on continuity and say that as I read Season 8, I was continually judging whether this fit into my personal view of Buffy continuity, official say-so be damned. And now that it's done, my honest response is that it doesn't feel like it fits, and that something's missing.

In issue 40 there's an exchange between Willow and Buffy where Willow tells Buffy that even though she saved the world from destruction, the world lost its heart in the process, and in the long run that might be worse. That's not too far off from how I feel about this book. There's something that didn't survive the transition from weekly episodic hour-long drama to monthly 22 page comic. Maybe it's not hearing the lines delivered by flesh and blood actors. Maybe it's the fact that this format doesn't afford the time for the kind of extended banter that told you who these characters are. Maybe it's the fact that you can't sit around a comic and read it all at once with your friends the way you can all sit and watch an episode of Buffy together, all experiencing the timing of the performances and delivery of the lines at exactly the same instant. Maybe it's little bits of all those things at once.

Buffy finished its seventh television season with an ending that had a strong sense of finality, and there's something to be said for a conclusion that doesn't give us the full, unabridged, Tolkien-esque appendix detail on what happens to all the characters for the rest of their lives. In a perfect world I'd be able to enjoy reading Season 8, appreciate for its differences and then mentally put it in a place not directly connected to the seven seasons of television. But I have read it, I can't fully separate it, and yet I can be glad for parts of it, particularly issue 40. And I can look forward to Season 9, and give Whedon and the book's other creators another chance to make these characters as familiar to me again as they felt in this issue.

What were your thoughts as you read Buffy's first full season as a comic, and do you plan to follow it into the next season as well?

Comics Alliance

Wednesday Comics Reviews: Buffy The Vampire Slayer Season Eight #40 and Hellblazer #275


Submitted by Rich Johnston on January 19, 2011

I have in my hands the final copy of Buffy Season Eight, issue 40, courtesy of Orbital Comics. This is how the season ends, not with a bang (that was issue 34) but with a whimper. And a whine. And a moan. And a groan. You know that oft-promised comic book lie “this story will change everything forever”? Well this one kinda did, for Buffy and friends at least. And sets up the dystopian slayerless magicless future seen in Fray.

It’s been a rough ride, the Buffy comic, with some real problematic moments. The temptation to ue an unlimited budget, no longer hampered  by TV special effects, showed that Buffy shone with its limitations, forcing the supernatural story to work, and work better, even without massive dragons or hordes of centaurs. Once Buffy’s world expands to cover armies, huge supernatural disasters and massive monsters, something in Buffy seems to break.

But this final issue is the antithesis of this. Written by Joss Whedon, this is a comic of small moments. Buffy and friends (and enemies), working out where she stands with everyone, their feelings about her actions that both saved the world and doomed it. Buffy has never shied away from consequences of actions, in the TV show we saw death and destruction more commonly than a reset button, with the show willing to sacrifice cast members in order to drill that home. And in the comic book, that was followed through. People have suffered, and more importantly people have changed. This is a comic that did not rest on its laurels and if sometimes it faltered, that was never through being lazy and boring.

There have been some issues with the art through the run of the comic, Georges Jeanty seems to have fallen between two stools, never quite getting a consistent photographic likeness of the characters he was portraying, never quite getting a consistent cartoon of the characters from panel to panel either. There’s one scene here with Buffy and Willow, and Buffy looks so different to the way she was portrayed a panel ago, that I honestly thought it must have been a different character. And given that issue, the script has seemed shoddy in helping the reader identify the characters. Unnecessary in a TV or movie script, here we could have really done with a few more nomenclatures. This kind of thing really took me out of the comic repeatedly. Jeanty will be drawing Teen Titans 92 (replacing the solicited Nicola Scott) and will probably show a lot more consistency there without having photo models to be dragged back to.

And speaking of the future, as well as an epilogue to the story so far, it’s also a prologue to what is to come. The Buffy cast are all proper-grown-up now, yet the world suddenly feels more like Season One/Two Buffy. Less big bads to destroy the world, more vampires to fight. There is one slayer – one who calls herself a slayer at least. And there is the detritus of the comic, strewn far and wide, physically and emotionally. It’s an end, but it’s a hell of an intriguing beginning too.

It’s not the only comic going through momentous changes. John Constantine is getting married in Hellblazer issue 275. And, spoiler alert, he actually does it. Despite being killed and becoming a ghost, despite a demonic entity actually getting to the deconsecrated church on time first, despite every sign that there will be a massive get out clause, they actually tie the knot. Done and dusted.

And all sorts of people from John’s history come out of the dark. Some alive, some dead and some much mourned. Including a certain Kit (left).

Because, yes, if John is going to get married, then the greatest love of his life, the one who got away, the one who survived, may have cause to say a thing or two. And she does.

There’s an awful lot of good quality fanwank stuff here from Peter Milligan, as well as an emphasis on the present, exactly how John’s bride Epiphany copes with his world, and the added complications she brings to John’s life, it’s clearly not a one way street here.

Given that Simon Bisley has been providing heavily detailed digital pencils of late, it’s a oddity for Giuseppe Camuncoli to give us almost a blast to Simon’s past, his simpler pen and ink work from his early Lobo days, but it fits the nostalgic feel of the comic, even as it keeps an eye on the future.

And yes, just like Buffy, Hellblazer is all about consequences of being close to John Constantine. And very heavily we’re left with the realisation that the couple may be happy, but the people they have left in their wake are as damaged as all hell. Literally.

Will Ephinany survive her marriage to John? She seems to show that she’s got a good chance. But if there’s one thing John does to women he’s close to, it’s put them in refrigerators.

Kit doesn’t seem to regret her escape that much…

Comics from Orbital Comics of London, England.

Bleeding Cool

Tuesday, January 18, 2011

A Buffy mastermind goes back to high school

Marti Noxon was a producer of Buffy the Vampire Slayer, and now she's coming back to superpowered teenagers with the movie I Am Number Four, coming next month. She talked to us about aliens, super-violence, and dealing with internet haters.

If you're a fan of Buffy the Vampire Slayer, then you're also a fan of Marti Noxon, whose creative vision helped shape the show. She wrote more episodes of Buffy than anyone apart from Jane Espenson and creator Joss Whedon, and became the show's executive producer. And now she's the screenwriter of I Am Number Four, the movie based on the bestselling young adult novel about a fugitive alien in high school. Number Four has to discover his superpowers and romance a formerly popular girl named Sarah, while dealing with both mean jocks and the super-alien predators who are hunting him down.

We were lucky enough to talk to her about I Am Number Four — and we'll also have an exclusive follow-up Q&A with her about her other movie project, Fright Night, later on.

Minor spoilers for I Am Number Four ahead...

What appealed to you about adapting this novel?

Well, when I came into the project, there were already a couple of scripts, and so at that point, I was reacting more to the the movie that Dreamworks was envisioning. And I think I responded to the same thing that I love about the Spider-man stories, which is real characters in extraordinary situations, and to some extent the Buffy story too. Even though the main charater knows that he's from another planet, we're on a journey with him, as he discovers his power and the challenges that he's going to face. And the whole goal was to keep it grounded.

So there were already two scripts that other writers had done? What did you bring to it, when you came in and rewrote it?

I did a lot of work on some of the character stuff. There was a really good structure in place, and a lot of good character foundation. But part of what Dreamworks was looking to do was expand the appeal of the movie, and make sure that the female characters were feeling really lived in. And Sarah and John's relationship is really a big part of the movie. I was just like, "Teen alien romance? I'm so in." Supernatural mixed with romance is one of my sweet spots. I'm a sucker.

Reading the novel, I didn't really understand Sarah's character that much. She's the popular girl, but she's given up being popular and now she's sort of an outcast.

I hope that in the movie, it's much more clear, what happened and why she is where she is in her life, and why she sees things the way she does. And of course, the actress, Dianna [Agron] from Glee is amazing. She's so appealing, so warm. She gives it a whole additional dimension, which is really exciting to see.

What's it like going back to paranormal high school after Buffy? How is this different from how Buffy treated these themes?

I mean, tonally this is a really different movie. This is much more in the vein of Twilight. The world of Buffy was overtly comic, overtly kind of pushed into a kind of genre world that was a little bit over the top. This is much more living in that space of "What if this was really happening?" And so, tonally, that's just a different vibe, you're not looking as broadly at the comedy, [and] what there is much specific to the charcters. The dialogue on Buffy was just so stylized. I went back and rewatched a couple of episodes, and I was like, "Wow, I forgot how intensely we worked the language." They were speaking their own fricken language. That's a really fun kind of writing, but it's really different than trying, on some level, to keep your ears to how people are talking now and what sounds credible.

So there's been a huge surge in interest in young-adult paranormal and science fiction stories, including things like Hunger Games as well as Twilight. What do you think is behind this?

I don't know. I don't know if it's cyclical. I don't know if the big shows like Buffy and Roswell and Supernatural and [other] shows on television penetrated that market, [and] it's kind of feeding on itself. Now there's more books like that, and more media like that. There were a few shows that broke through and captured people's imagination. And the interesting thing is, I'm always talking to real young people who are discovering Buffy, Angel and Firefly right now, through DVDs. And of course, the Twilight phenomenon was a huge, huge boon to that industry. I do think it's an appetite that's been discovered over the last 10-12 years, and we'll see if it cycles out again.

I'm not a huge apocalyptic theorist. You know, a lot of people have theories about people's fear of the end of the world, and that really makes us way into fantasy. And tough times lead to this kind of renaissance in fantasy fiction. I just think it comes and goes into popularity. Lucky for me, we're in a big upswing.

I heard revisions to the novel went hand in hand with scripting the movie version. How did that process work?

There was definite communication between James [Frey] and the studio. And by the time I came on, the book was already in galleys, so we, again, were locked into things that were written. But I know that earlier in the process, yeah, there was a little bit of give and take about things that the studio would tell James we were doing, and he might cotton to some of those ideas.

What were the biggest differences you ended up with between the book and the movie?

[The movie is] very much in the time and space it's in. We don't do a lot of backstory on [the alien's home planet] Lorien. And we don't do a lot of explaining of the mythology of the nine. That's kept relatively sparse. But I think it's pretty easy to understand the general concept. They came here, the Mogadorians are after them, and the nine [aliens] have been depleted. All that's pretty clear. But we found that too much mythology was confusing people. It's all backstory, it's all stuff you don't actually see.

One of the interesting things in the book is that it's a science fiction world, with aliens and space travel, but there are also spells and magic. How do you work that in the movie?

I think if there's one element we didn't incorporate much from the book, [it would be the magic spells]. We didn't do a lot about the magic or the spells, there are allusions to it, we didn't go too much into that. And I think if there's more I Am Number Four, there'll be more of that.

Back when you were working on Buffy, you were one of the first creative people working in Hollywood to experience an internet backlash. Nowadays it's common for writers and producers to be attacked on message boards, blogs or other online forums, but it was a relatively new phenomenon when you experienced it. What did you learn from that experience?

I was personally attacked for [Buffy] season six, yeah. [Laughs] I mean, on the one hand, I get that people didn't really understand the process, because Joss was very involved creatively [in that season]. So it was like okay, people don't really know what's going on here, that's fine. But on the other hand, I am hypersensitive, and criticism wounds me far too deeply. And I never cultivated a fanbase on the internet, in part because I'm afraid of needing that, needing the approval of people I don't know. I already worked so hard to get it from the people I do know, [so] a legion of people who are strangers to me is even more daunting. So I felt like I could have gone on there, and defended myself and explained myself. But then I thought, "You know, if I get into this, it's a rabbit hole, from which I shall never return." [Laughs]

It was uncomfortable, but ... it also probably did me a real service, because I mostly steer clear of all that chatter, I don't go on the Web to look at comments about I Am Number Four. I haven't looked at comments about Fright Night. I just keep my head down and do my work. And you know, I probably missed some good and thoughtful stuff, but in the big picture, it can be a real creative drain. It can be a distraction. I know that people on genre shows have jumped off Twitter or [other online forums]. Because they get into defending themselves. There's a benefit to dialogue with your audience, but so many people in the internet are ready to engage in a fight. And that's just not my style.

I Am Number Four comes out on Feb. 18.

IO9

Sunday, January 16, 2011

A New Buffy The Vampire Slayer Movie?

A Buffy The Vampire Slayer movie remake? I'd rather see a new movie with Sarah Michele Gellar and the old Buffy cast in a new adventure.

 Buffy The Vampire Slayer Movie

Saturday, January 15, 2011

Sarah Michelle Gellar Returning to TV!


The actress who created my very favorite television character in history is back!

Sarah Michelle Gellar Returning to TV!Deadline reports that Sarah Michelle Gellar is returning to network television! (Yes, I know she did not CREATE the character of Buffy, but the movie just didn’t count.)

Sarah Michelle will star in a new drama called Ringer which was just greenlighted by CBS as the first drama pickup of the season. The show is written the team that created Supernatural. Deadline reports:

"Ringer, written on spec by Supernatural writer-producers Eric Charmelo & Nicole Snyder, centers on a troubled young woman (Gellar) who, while on the run from the mob, hides out by inhabiting the life of her wealthy twin sister, until she learns that her twin’s life has a bounty on it as well. Brillstein’s Peter Traugott is executive producing, with Gellar, Charmelo and Snyder co-executive producing. Geller, repped by ICM and Brillstein’s Joanne Colonna, has been heavily pursued by the broadcast networks since the end of Buffy in 2003. Her only TV gig since then had been the HBO pilot The Wonderful Maladys."

There’s no doubt I’ll be watching. In fact, I can’t imagine anything ELSE I could be doing.  Alas, she won’t be slaying any vampires (as far as I can tell from the description of the show — but who knows???) but being on the run from the mob ain’t so different!

My Gloss

Sarah Michelle Gellar looks set to return to the small screen in new CBS series


After making her name in the hit show Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Sarah Michelle Gellar made the leap onto the big screen as a movie star.

But it seems she could be set to make her long-awaited return to the small screen with the filming of a new pilot for U.S. TV channel CBS.

The actress, 33, is to appear in a pilot of a new drama called Ringer.

The show is about a troubled young woman on the run, who tries to escape by posing as her wealthy twin sister. She then discovers her sister's life has a 'bounty' on it as well.

If picked up by the network the show would mark Gellar's return to television.

The mother-of-one, married to actor Freddie Prinze Jr, starred in the show Buffy for seven seasons before deciding to make a career in movies.

While had hits with The Grudge, Cruel Intentions and I Know What You Did Last Summer, Gellar has had varying degrees of success at the box office.

She has made it clear in recent years that she wishes to concentrate on her home life, even turning down a role in the hit Stardust to spend time with her husband.

Gellar has attempted to return to TV before, appearing in a pilot for HBO in 2009, although it was not picked up by the network.

Daily Mail

Friday, January 14, 2011

'Buffy the Vampire Slayer' More Popular Than 'The Dark Knight Rises' ... On Twitter

By Erik Davis

Posted Jan 14th 2011 10:40AM

Twitter has become a place that can (arguably) make or break a movie. It's become a home for a film critic's first reaction (especially at film festivals), and some of the most heated film-related debates (not to mention petty little arguments) occur there on a daily basis. So if a film is popular on Twitter, does that mean it's going to cash in big at the box office? No, not necessarily, since Twitter -- as much as we'd like to see it as the center of everyone's universe -- is simply not that big a deal to a great majority of the moviegoing public (if it was, films like 'Scott Pilgrim vs. the World' would've killed at the box office). Still, though, it's fun to see which films receive the most hype on Twitter, if only to get a solid read on the types of people using the social network day in and day out.

Ad Age put together an interesting list featuring the top movies discussed on Twitter that aren't in theaters yet. The number one slot went to 'The Hobbit,' which seemed to be in the news every other day due to its various pre-production woes. Coming in at number two, surprisingly, was the recently announced 'Buffy the Vampire Slayer' remake, proving (if anything) that folks are still thirsting for more Buffy.

Fanboys, prepare yourselves for battle because Zack Snyder's 'Superman: The Man of Steel' (in the third spot) was more popular than 'The Dark Knight Rises' (in the fourth spot). Oh it's on!

Additionally, Ad Age says that an 'Edward Scissorhands' remake would've snatched up the third spot had one actually existed. Rounding out the top seven were 'Thor,' 'Fast Five,' and 'Captain America: The First Avenger.'

What do you think? Does this list represent the seven upcoming films you're most anticipating?

Moviefone

Charisma Carpenter, on Joss-less Buffy movie: “Stupid”

by Keith McDuffee

The old 'Buffy' cast members are coming out of the woodwork against the idea of a new movie without the involvement of Joss Whedon. Like that's a surprise.

Charisma Carpenter, on Joss less Buffy movie: Stupid [ccarpenter twitter 150x150] (IMAGE)I think we need to keep a running tally of the number of Buffy alums who think the reported Buffy the Vampire Slayer movie — being created without Joss Whedon‘s involvement, by Warner Bros. — is a bad idea. We’ve already heard from Alyson Hannigan, Nicholas Brendon, Tony Head and Joss himself, and they have little to say in support of it.

The latest cast member from the original series to thumb their nose at the proposed Buffy movie is Charisma Carpenter, who portrayed Cordelia Chase in the television show’s first three seasons, and then on Angel for a few more. Via Twitter, last week:

“@jprit13: @CLCarpenter1970 I was wondering what you though of the new Buffy movie? It’d be so much better if it had Cordy!” stupid. No joss? A real head scratcher.

It’s not much of a surprise that most of the original Scoobies would think any sort of Buffy-related material without Whedon’s involvement wouldn’t be a good idea. It’s no secret that Joss takes good care of those he’s worked with before, often involving them in many of his other projects. They appear to be an understandably tightly-knit group, which is partly why it’s so easy for Buffyverse fans to follow Joss and those who’ve worked with him wherever they go.

So, this begs the question: Are Buffy fans more interested in Joss Whedon’s involvement or in simply seeing their beloved series come back to life, no matter the means? The first movie wasn’t nearly as successful as the television series, and I’ve heard or read somewhere before that Joss wasn’t all that happy with how his vision was handled there. Could it be that a better movie — even without the involvement of Joss and the original cast — would be a good thing for the franchise? Might it ignite a new group of fans eager to pick up the old television series DVDs? Should we Buffy fans even care?

Who’s next to come out in non-support for the Joss-less Buffy movie?

Clique Clack

Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Josh Whedon sing Along at Zinema 2

It’s take two — or rather “Once More, With Feeling” — on the “Joss Whedon Sing Along,” which made its debut this past summer at Zinema 2.

The “Joss Whedon Sing Along” is a double feature that includes viewings — and singings — of the “Buffy the Vampire Slayer” musical and “Dr. Horrible’s Sing Along Blog” created by Whedon, the clever nerdist behind supercool sci-fi programming rich in other-worldly characters and snappy dialogue. See: “Buffy,” “Dollhouse,” “Firefly.” And, in some cases, he incorporates music. See: Guest director for “Glee.”

Season 6, Episode 7 of “Buffy the Vampire Slayer” was the episode-length musical “Once More, With Feeling.” The premise being that an evil force has taken over Sunnydale, and the Scooby Gang is unable to stop themselves from bursting into soul revealing songs like:

“Going through the Motions,” the title character’s emo expression; “Under Your Spell,” a love song for a witch (Willow) from a witch (Tara); and a sort of Fred Astaire/Ginger Rogers moment between Anya and Xander to the song “I’ll Never Tell.”

Whedon followed that with the internet-specific release of “Dr. Horrible’s Sing Along Blog,” a super hero versus not-so-super hero musical.

There is also a costume contest during the intermission. Free wearable ideas: Rubber gloves and goggles, red lingerie, vampire with a shock of Billy Idol-blond hair, a cheesy Nathan Fillion-esque smile.

Warning: This event sold out last time.

GO SEE IT

What: Joss Whedon Sing Along

When: 9:30 p.m. Friday

Where: Zinema 2, 222 E. Superior St.

Tickets: $9.50

Duluth News tribune

Buffy Season 8 Motion Comic DVD Review

January 12, 2011

I am unaware if there have been long-standing plans to turn Buffy the Vampire Slayer season 8 from its initial comic book form into a motion comic. While it cannot have escaped your attention that the Buffy franchise is moving on without Joss Whedon, this seems like a nice sendoff that winks and says, “This is the established level you are going up against.” We can only hope that the new Buffy movie will come close to what the masterminds behind Buffy seasons 1-8 have created.

buffy motion comic

So, let’s talk about that. I’m a huge fan of Buffy the Vampire Slayer and its spin-off, Angel. A comic book fan? Meeh, not so much. Still, life is all about adapting. What we have here is a motion comic, which is not exactly animation but a far cry from static images being shown on the screen. There are voiceovers who read aloud from the pages while you view the images (which have their own method of being animated with special effects, pans and camera zooms.)

This is a newer form of media that’s hitting the mainstream, in one sense. But in another sense, I completely remember being entertained by children’s TV shows in the 80’s which used similar formats (remember the guy on PBS who would draw a picture as he read a story?)  Thing is, it is entertaining so don’t write it off. While it may seem to be a tame way to present a story on DVD/Blu-ray, it’s simply a different way to present a story. With the Buffy Motion Comic you get to see the great illustrations, for instance.

When it comes to the voice-acting, you really have to get used to these new voices. It would have been amazing had they been able to get some of the original actors to voice parts, but maybe it’s better that they’re all new so that we don’t look down on the writing and storylines helped by any less familiar voices. Sadly, the voice I dislike the most is the person who voices Buffy Summers. I feel she lacks a sense of humor or sarcasm in her voice (which you need to say a lot of these Whedon lines!) So that’s a bit of a bummer. Still, the plots are really engrossing and I liked it overall.

buffy motion comic dvdWhile this is labeled as the Motion Comic for Buffy Season 8, they should have added that it’s more of a Volume One Motion Comic. Buffy Season 8 had over 40 issues, and there are 19 issues (each of the issue episodes runs about 11-15 minutes) included on this DVD/Blu ray combo. It seems highly likely that executives are just testing the water, to see if people are interested enough for them to continue down this road. (Let them know that you are interested by purchasing a copy!)

The quality of the pictures is fantastic. I love seeing the characters I’ve known for so long rendered in these artistic ways.

The packaging has cover art as removable cardboard on the outside, and then you can also see the cover as an insert which is the cover of an included comic book.  It’s a little different than what you’re used to.

buffy season 8 motion comicThe Buffy Season 8 Motion Comic Special Features for the Blu-ray include a doc named “Under Buffy’s Spell”, test pilot for the motion comic, a trivia game and an art gallery of the covers of the comics. The DVD special features have all of that but also have an option to create your very own Buffy Comic using Tooncast Studio DVD-Rom. There is also the included comic.

A true sign of the changing times in technology? Get this up on Netflix Instant Watch, and the future will seem much happier for all Buffy fans.

Whether this can ever live up to your standards of the original TV series, that’s hard to say. But it’s certainly worth your time, and a must-see for all Buffy fans. Creative, artistic and gripping, Buffy and her friends always going to be a welcome sight.

You can buy each issue for 99 cents on Amazon Video on Demand. You can also buy the DVD/Blu-ray combo on Amazon for $22.99 which I think is the right price for the included content.

Disclosure: A copy was sent for review purposes.

Small Screen Scoop

‘Buffy 2.0’ – should they put a stake in it?

Tuesday, 11th January 2011
Natalija Sasic

Some of you may have read last month that Buffy the Vampire Slayer is to be rebooted as a movie for a 2012 release. Of course, as a hardcore Buffy fan, I was ready to bust out the celebratory confetti – that is, until I discovered that the “new” Buffy did not involve any of the original writing staff, cast and, most importantly, Buffy’s much-loved creator Joss Whedon.

Now, there’s no need to over-dramatize the situation – a Buffy superfan still has plenty of ways to obsess. There’s the Season 8 comic book series and its corresponding motion-comics (available to download on iTunes here), endorsed and written by the people that made us love Buffy in the first place. It’s worth making the most out of re-watching DVDs, and of course, there are always prolific sources of Buffy internet fanfiction. Whatever happens, no one is going to ‘steal’ Buffy from its fans. But it’s not about who has a ‘claim’ to it. It’s the sheer ignorance that this is a story that has travelled too far and laid its foundations too solidly to ever be able to start from scratch.

Having started out as an outrageously camp 1992 film with Kristy Swanson in the title role, even though it was pitched and written by Joss Whedon it didn’t quite fulfil his ideals ("I didn't agree with the way the movie was going,” he admitted after the TV show had wrapped). His vision was for an empowered female heroine in a supernatural-horror genre with a slight self-mocking tone, supported by a diverse catalogue of characters and a crackling witty script; it was eventually fulfilled in a formula that sizzled on television screens.

But it didn’t come without its own set of problems: “The network begged me to change the title,” Whedon recalled – it may even partly explain why its ratings were never exactly stellar. In some ways, this was what baffled me with the decision to reimagine Buffy: so much prejudice already exists for that name, there is no way a new potential fanbase will take it seriously.

But it was because Buffy was a hell of a television series that it defied the legions of eye-rolls that were triggered by its title – it was “a B Movie that had something more going on” in Whedon’s words; part of its charm. The name ‘Buffy’ in knowing TV circles became synonymous with thoughtfully executed storytelling, meaningful character development and even its own slanguage and sense of humour. It became a well-respected brand.

So as well as being taken on, as Seth Green (who played werewolf Oz) put it, to “capitalise on a trend” (movie execs think audiences will prance to the cinema just upon hearing the word ‘vampire’ nowadays), it’s because Buffy has a good enough reputation that it’s a risk worth taking. But here’s what I truly believe: some creative projects are so special and one-of-a-kind that they can only occur at a specific time with a particular roster of people involved. It will generate lifelong fans and forever be fondly looked back upon as something worthwhile. But one of the tragedies in life is to recognise that such shooting stars can never have their success replicated – one can only hope to tread upon a new fresh idea that can capture and cling on to the imaginations of millions. Real Buffy fans accept this – and will subsequently boycott Buffy 2.0, I’m sure.

If we’re faced with the grim prospect of thousands of tween girls debating over who’s hotter, Robert Pattinson or whoever plays ‘new Angel’, then I will be the first to call it the start of a trademark Buffy apocalypse. But it could also spark a renaissance in Buffy culture – a whole new generation of Buffy fandom. And that just may be worth shaking a stake at.

The Yorker

Sunday, January 9, 2011

Seth Green Points to Audience Confusion Over Buffy Remake


More reaction to the "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" remake from alumni has made its way online. This time Seth Green, who played the werewolf Oz for several seasons on the show, spoke about the upcoming film's effect on the fan base.

When asked during an interview with CNN about his thoughts on the reboot, Green replied:

"I saw that Joss wrote that open letter. Let's be fair, all he really said was, 'Hey, this isn't even 10 years old.' Are we really at the place where we're remaking 'Two and a Half Men'? Is that really still on the air, and we're remaking it? And where is the need for that other than some kind of capitalizing on a trend. You know, there's no public outcry for a remake of Buffy, there's only the opportunity in pop culture where vampires are very popular.

If Joss came out and said, 'I want to make a new Buffy movie,' even if he said, 'I want to do it like the reboot of Spider-Man. I want to put Buffy back in high school and I want to tell a different story with this character,' I think people would go with that. But the fact that people who are not connected to it and were not connected to the show or any of the mythology that was created going back to the movie -- which everyone kind of agreed wasn't a perfect version of its potential -- you know, I think that really confuses people. It confuses the audience. They're like, 'How am I supposed to feel about this?'

Couldn't agree more.

Dread Central

Friday, January 7, 2011

Seth Green talks 'Robot Chicken,' Lucas and 'Buffy'


By Ann Hoevel, CNN
January 7, 2011

Know who's one degree away from Kevin Bacon? Thanks to the new season of "Robot Chicken," it's Seth Green.

Green, known for playing characters that make a lasting impression on pop culture (like Oz from the TV series "Buffy the Vampire Slayer," Scott Evil from the "Austin Powers" movies and Chris Griffin from the irreverent animated series "Family Guy") has found critical acclaim with "Robot Chicken."

The stop-motion animated series he created with Matt Senreich won an Emmy last year for Outstanding Short-Format Animated Program and has earned Green multiple nominations for his voice work. Their "Star Wars" parody/tribute specials are endorsed by George Lucas.

Green spoke with CNN about the upcoming season. The fifth season of "Robot Chicken" premieres on Cartoon Network's Adult Swim on Sunday, January 9. (Cartoon Network, like CNN is a Time Warner company.)

CNN: You're pretty much cornering the market on stop-motion television. How hard is that?

Seth Green: The show's tricky. We do 20 episodes in a year, basically. It's 11 months from the time we start doing our writing to the time we deliver our post [production].

This year was longer because we folded an hourlong "Star Wars" special into the middle of our production, so it will wind up being 15 months when it's all over. It's a long, long process.

But we love stop-motion, and it's a really communicative medium. It looks just like film, and you see real shadows, and you see light and your brain registers something that's tactile that you've maybe interacted with. That helps you to believe that what's on film is actually happening, which makes it funnier. It's a medium that's rarely used for comedy, and I think that's a mistake.
'Robot Chicken' tackles Oompa-Loompas
Seth Green talks ControlTV

CNN: Are you debuting any new action figures or characters this season?

Green: We got some Charlie Brown, some Harry Potter, some He-Man. Gobots, Matrix, Avatar, Buck Rogers, Transformers, RoboCop, it's a good one.

Oh! The "Back to the Future" -- I don't want to tease this too hard because it's so late in the season, but we have a "Back to the Future" crossover with Jay-Z ... it's not the real Jay-Z. It's pretty cool, we got Christopher Lloyd to do it.

I'm really excited about this season. We had Jon Hamm, Bryan Cranston, Kevin Bacon, Megan Fox, what a crazy year!

CNN: Do you ever have any guest "cluckers" on the show?

Green: In the closing credits? We've never re-recorded that since the first season, except for "Star Wars," and it was all the same people. In our post department, when Chris McKay was editing the show before he was directing it, he came up with that song and got everybody together to cluck it, and we've just kept it. No one's ever asked for that!

CNN: How awesome is it, knowing that George Lucas likes your work? How hard is it to control your fanboi around him?

Green: It's crazy. It's crazy stuff. We're getting to work with him now on this new animated thing, and get to spend time with him actually writing stuff, and it is one of the more surreal experiences I've ever had.

And you have to just tune all that out and really focus on the work you've got to do to make what you're working on good. And not be overwhelmed by the fact that you're actually getting to do it. You just have to dig down and say, "All right, what are we trying to accomplish here, make this funny and good," and we can worry about the fact that we're, like, creating "Star Wars" together, later. [Lucasfilm has not yet formally announced the upcoming animated "Star Wars" comedy series project.]

CNN: Who's your dream "Robot Chicken" guest star? Maybe we can help get that out there.

Green: We've been targeting Harrison Ford pretty hard for a while now, and whenever people ask us who we're trying to get, we always go after him. Just because eventually he's going to hear it and either think we're so obnoxious that he's going to tell us to f*** off or he's going to come do the show.

CNN: What are your thoughts on the new Buffy the Vampire Slayer movie that's in the works (and does not involve creator Joss Whedon)?

Green: I saw that Joss wrote that open letter. Let's be fair, all he really said was, "Hey, this isn't even 10 years old." Are we really at the place where we're remaking "Two and a Half Men"? Is that really still on the air, and we're remaking it? And where is the need for that other than some kind of capitalizing on a trend. You know, there's no public outcry for a remake of Buffy, there's only the opportunity in pop culture where vampires are very popular.

If Joss came out and said, "I want to make a new Buffy movie," even if he said, "I want to do it like the reboot of Spider-Man. I want to put Buffy back in high school and I want to tell a different story with this character," I think people would go with that. But the fact that people who are not connected to it and were not connected to the show or any of the mythology that was created going back to the movie -- which everyone kind of agreed wasn't a perfect version of its potential -- you know, I think that really confuses people. It confuses the audience. They're like, "How am I supposed to feel about this?"

CNN: Will we see you work with Whedon again anytime soon?

Green: I have told Joss, publicly and privately, that I will do anything for him. Everybody that worked on that show gave me some of the best material I've ever gotten to work with. I'm super grateful for that experience and that opportunity.

CNN: Are you a nerd or a geek, and what's the difference between the two?

Green: Typically, by definition, nerds are interested in things that are not mainstream and may be subculture -- but subculture with usually a mythical bend or mathematic bend or scientific bend. So nerds are typically interested in subculture things that have to do with science or wizards or superpowers. Whereas geeks, I guess, usually tend to be the extreme version of that, where they're less able to relate to actual, other human beings that aren't interested in the same thing. Like geeks tend to be so focused and consumed with their subculture interests that they are incapable of communicating or interacting with other people; i.e., leaving the house or making dates or having social engagements.

Which am I? I've always been more of a nerd than a geek. ... You don't like that definition? Hold on, wait a sec, my partner disagrees. ... (Green's collaborator Matt Senreich furrows his brow at Green and speaks up.)

Matt Senreich: I'm sorry, I don't mean to interrupt.

Green: No, no, no, let's hear it, you might be an authority having dealt with ... (to CNN) This is Matt Senreich, who before I stole him away to make "Robot Chicken" was the editorial director for Wizard Publications, which in its day had five different banners that Matt was in charge of, including "ToyFare" and "Wizard," which were the premiere genre magazines for both toys and comics.

CNN: Matt, we love your nerd pedigree.

Senreich: All right! I just disagree with that [nerd/geek] definition. We always said that geeks were more into the pop culture subculture, if you will, whereas a nerd was more book-smart.

Green: So define that. So the geeks, you're saying, are into cosplay and D&D?

Senreich: Geeks are into what is considered pop culture [as if it were] a science, in a sense, where they know all the little intricacies that nobody else would pay attention to. Whereas a nerd is more book-smart, and is the guy in math class who can answer a million different scientific equations. That was the definition we always used at Wizard. We always catered to the geeks, and the nerds would end up reading if they wanted but may not. Nerds are more high brow.

Green: A slight difference of opinion here, a yin and a yang, if you will.

 CNN