A blog about the new Buffy The Vampire Slayer Movie. http://www.slayermovie.com
Friday, January 28, 2011
Jane Espenson: Writer, sci-fi thriller, one nerdy lady
(CNN) -- If Jane Espenson were to write a personal profile for an online dating service, it might read something like this:
Motivated, creative woman who is not afraid to confront complicated issues ranging from imagining ways to kill off threatening vampires to interspecies sexual encounters (hey, I don't judge!) seeking like-minded mate who won't mind sharing me with my other passion, writing.
Old enough to remember "Barney Miller" but young enough to be responsible for identifying a fault with a warp drive that was slowly tearing the time-space continuum, heralding the development a new generation warp drive. Food enthusiast and forward thinker.
It's probably not the kind of ad many of her Midwestern childhood friends would identify with, but it's just the kind of credentials that attract suitors in the world of thrilling television series, where executives need to keep the creative flow of ideas coming in order to feed the demand. Jane Espenson is up to it and then some.
Growing up Jane
As writer or co-executive producer of some of the biggest cult science-fiction shows of the past decade, Espenson, 46, gets a sardonic kick out of her job.
"When I was a kid, I really identified with the character of Joe Rossi on 'Lou Grant.' He was this writer who knew he was good, and all the other characters thought he was so obnoxious, but I would watch him at home and think that I wanted to be that: a good writer and proud of it. If I've succeeded, then I've managed to become obnoxious! Heh!"
Born and raised in Iowa, Espenson was the kind of girl who often asked for more homework.
But during non-study moments, shows like "M*A*S*H" and "The Mary Tyler Moore Show" captured her imagination, turning her into a self-proclaimed addict of good television.
She soon wanted to create her own form of entertainment, even if it would take her a while to realize her potential (on shows like "Buffy the Vampire Slayer," "Battlestar Galactica," "Caprica" and "Gilmore Girls," just to name a few.)
As a teenager, Espenson found out that the producers of "M*A*S*H" accepted scripts on spec, without promise of payment or future work. Even though she wasn't an established writer, she set out to write her first episode.
"It was a disaster," she recalled. "I never sent it. I didn't know the correct format. I didn't know the address of where to send it, and then I thought, they can't really hire me until I finish junior high anyway." Jane went on to college at the University of California, Berkeley, honing her skills in computer science and linguistics before being called back by her passion to write.
She read that "Star Trek: The Next Generation" also accepted scripts on spec while she was still in graduate school, at the age of 25, so she tried again.
"I wrote three of them," Espenson said, "and they called me about the second of the three and told me they wanted me to come in and pitch."
She wasn't really sure what that meant, but she went to L.A. anyway to meet with the show's producers and give it her best shot. They ultimately didn't use her story ideas, but they did use one of the premises she put forth.
"The premise was that every time we go to warp speed, we find out we've been tearing the time-space continuum, essentially polluting, and they ending up doing that and even developing a special kind of warp drive we see in later shows."
Espenson's own career didn't hit warp speed immediately, though, and she knew that she had to try multiple entries into the field if she were to succeed. In 1992, she received an ABC Disney writers fellowship. She packed up her things and moved to L.A. but knew she had a lot going against her.
Namely, she was a woman and therefore a buzzkill in the writing room.
"It's like being the one girl in the locker room," Espenson said. "You are simultaneously the beloved little sister and the odd person out."
Espenson had a number of successes in the early '90s as a writer for both comedy and science-fiction. In 1997, she joined the staff of "Ellen" as a writer-producer. It solidified her roots in comedy and helped her learn not to take herself or her situation too seriously.
Success measured in the "Buff"
Espenson learned to make her feminine side work in the male-dominated writing rooms she inhabited for much of the '90s. When she went to work for an animated show called "Dinosaurs," she learned that being different had its advantages.
"There were all the boy writers and me, and it was that way for years," recalled Espenson. "It was a good thing, because I got to watch the whole process."
Although Espenson had amazing experiences on that show, later writing rooms were far more harsh.
"There is a rule where you can say anything in this room, so people try to be as shocking and appalling as they can. That becomes the prize, and a lot of times, that was at my expense," said Espenson, who insists that she has no bad feelings about it. "It's a good education. You learn to roll with it. You become one of the guys, or you become the girl. I tried not to do either of those things."
But she found that being a girl didn't matter nearly as much as having ideas that could sell. She realized that the day she went to get a writing job on a new show called "Buffy the Vampire Slayer."
First came an interview with the show-runner, responsible for the day-to-day running of the series. On "Buffy," it was sci-fi favorite Joss Whedon.
"It was terrifying but lovely," Espenson said.
Whedon ran his show a little differently from others. If you wanted to get hired, you had to pitch something great. So when Espenson threw out her ideas and heard that one of them had just been shot but not released, she knew she had the same mindset.
It was confirmed when someone else who was in the room that day told her that after she'd left, Whedon walked over to a white board and wrote just two words: Hire her.
Fans loved Buffy. The blonde high school student whose extracurricular activity happened to he hunting vampires was a cult hit, and working with Whedon served as a lesson for Espenson in how to stay true to character.
"Joss' credo was that we needed a reason to tell the story. He would ask, 'What's the Buffy of it?' " Espenson recalled. "It's about the journey, and it's her journey, and we kept coming in and pitching stories which were cool and had a great sci-fi hook, but Joss made clear that Buffy needed the emotional hook."
Espenson recalls, in one instance, waiting years until Buffy's right-hand man Xander was ready for an idea she wanted to write for him.
"I remember finding out that Nicholas Brendon, who played Xander, had a twin brother, so I pitched a story on that premise," Espenson said. "But Joss said Xander wasn't ready and held off for three years until it was the right emotional time for that character. He brings that kind of discipline."
"Battlestar" and beyond
When Espenson joined the cast of "Battlestar Galactica" for season four in 2006, she found herself in familiar territory as the only female writer in the room. She worked for Ronald D. Moore, whom she ranks among the best show-runners she's had.
"Ron was wonderful," Espenson said. "His ability to grasp things and know things so quickly and so decisively what will work is amazing. We gather around a cell phone and call him to pitch a story, and he would be in an airport somewhere and would just sit there and listen, and I'm thinking, 'oh, there are so many things we're leaving out.' And he'd just start saying, 'OK, I like it. Here's what you need to do,' and he would start rearranging scenes to make it work."
Espenson went on to become co-executive producer of the show as well as executive producer of the "Battlestar" movie "The Plan."
The experience was enough to whet her appetite for creative control, so when SyFy network executives offered her the job of show-runner for a spinoff called "Caprica," she went for it.
In her own words, it was her biggest mistake.
The job lasted a year, and the show was cancelled last fall. Espenson took it in stride and says she realizes that the demands of being a show-runner stretched her abilities.
As a self-proclaimed control freak, she found that she was controlling all the wrong things. Although she's extremely proud of the show and is happy to launch into praise for those who worked on it with her, it's hard not to notice the rare moment of raw personal reflection that gives insight into the Espenson mind.
"That's exactly why I wasn't a good show-runner," she said. "I'm too honest about my fears, so I just did it again. That's the biggest mistake I've made in this interview."
But don't buy it just yet. Espenson is a woman who knows what she does best.
"I think I'm a really, really good writer, which sounds awful, but I feel strongest when I have my fingers on the keys," Espenson said. "Projecting confidence and having the whole big vision thing in your head and knowing how to balance other things, that is all stuff I never bothered to learn."
She hasn't written off the idea of running another show some day, but she freely admits that next time, she'd do it differently.
"I think there's a way to run a show when you learn how to delegate the bits you don't do well," she says. "I'd do it again if it were the right project, but this time I'd have more partners around me."
Right now, it's not bad being Jane.
She's writing for "Torchwood" on Starz while working on a SyFy pilot titled "Good Cop, Dead Cop."
And she keeps interesting company. She had dinner with her old friend Joss Whedon and a bunch of other colleagues not long ago. They sat in a California restaurant and talked about the latest round of "Buffy" comic books while tossing around ideas for things to come.
Ah, if one could only imagine ...
CNN
10 Best Vampires Movies
These 10 Best Vampire Movies are from a time long, long before the onslaught of Stephanie Meyer. The Twilight saga has given vampires a bad rap. These vampire classics remind us of a time when vampires weren't angsty teens who sparkled.
1. "Interview with a Vampire." Tom Cruise, Brad Pitt, and a very young Kirsten Dunst star in this 1994 rendition of Anne Rice's novel. A reporter gets the chance of a lifetime: to interview a real-life bloodsucking vampire.
2. "Salem's Lot." While Stephen King's 1979 TV miniseries may not technically be a vampire movie, it set the bar for modern-day vampire stories.
3. "Nosferatu." This 1922 movie is the oldest on our list and, some say, the greatest vampire movie of all time. This silent chiller stars Max Schreck as the rodent-like Nosferatu.
4. "Dracula." This 1931 horror classic is the quintessential vampire movie. Bela Lugosi's performance as Dracula cemented his status as a classic horror legend.
5. "Bram Stoker's Dracula." The 1992 remake by Francis Ford Coppola stayed true to Bram Stoker's horror novel of the same name. Gary Oldman, Anthony Hopkins, and Winona Ryder all headlined this film that won three Oscars for Best Costumes, Best Makeup, and Best Effects.
6. "Buffy the Vampire Slayer." Who says all vampire movies must be serious? Criticize this choice all you want, but the 1992 cult classic launched a generation of vampire-lovers thanks to Joss Whedon's popular TV series of the same name.
7. "30 Days of Night." This 2007 film starred Josh Hartnett and imagined what would happen to a stranded Alaskan town if it was attacked by a terrifying unit of hungry, sharp-fanged vampires.
8. "Blade." You knew it was coming. "Blade" is one of the most famous unconventional vampire movies of all time. Wesley Snipes stars as a half-vampire, half-man set on eradicating evil vampires in this 1998 action movie.
9. "The Lost Boys." If you want a little 80's cheesiness with your vampire movies, you can't go wrong with this 1987 movie that featured both Corey Haim and Corey Feldman. Dianne Wiest and Kiefer Sutherland also star.
10. "From Dusk 'Til Dawn." "Quentin Tarantino" should really be a movie genre all its own. With Tarantino writing and acting in this vampire flick, you know it's going to be a campy gorefest. Roger Rodriguez directed this film that starred Hollywood greats like George Clooney, Salma Hayak, Juliette Lewis, and Harvey Keitel.
Screen Junkies
1. "Interview with a Vampire." Tom Cruise, Brad Pitt, and a very young Kirsten Dunst star in this 1994 rendition of Anne Rice's novel. A reporter gets the chance of a lifetime: to interview a real-life bloodsucking vampire.
2. "Salem's Lot." While Stephen King's 1979 TV miniseries may not technically be a vampire movie, it set the bar for modern-day vampire stories.
3. "Nosferatu." This 1922 movie is the oldest on our list and, some say, the greatest vampire movie of all time. This silent chiller stars Max Schreck as the rodent-like Nosferatu.
4. "Dracula." This 1931 horror classic is the quintessential vampire movie. Bela Lugosi's performance as Dracula cemented his status as a classic horror legend.
5. "Bram Stoker's Dracula." The 1992 remake by Francis Ford Coppola stayed true to Bram Stoker's horror novel of the same name. Gary Oldman, Anthony Hopkins, and Winona Ryder all headlined this film that won three Oscars for Best Costumes, Best Makeup, and Best Effects.
6. "Buffy the Vampire Slayer." Who says all vampire movies must be serious? Criticize this choice all you want, but the 1992 cult classic launched a generation of vampire-lovers thanks to Joss Whedon's popular TV series of the same name.
7. "30 Days of Night." This 2007 film starred Josh Hartnett and imagined what would happen to a stranded Alaskan town if it was attacked by a terrifying unit of hungry, sharp-fanged vampires.
8. "Blade." You knew it was coming. "Blade" is one of the most famous unconventional vampire movies of all time. Wesley Snipes stars as a half-vampire, half-man set on eradicating evil vampires in this 1998 action movie.
9. "The Lost Boys." If you want a little 80's cheesiness with your vampire movies, you can't go wrong with this 1987 movie that featured both Corey Haim and Corey Feldman. Dianne Wiest and Kiefer Sutherland also star.
10. "From Dusk 'Til Dawn." "Quentin Tarantino" should really be a movie genre all its own. With Tarantino writing and acting in this vampire flick, you know it's going to be a campy gorefest. Roger Rodriguez directed this film that starred Hollywood greats like George Clooney, Salma Hayak, Juliette Lewis, and Harvey Keitel.
Screen Junkies
Thursday, January 27, 2011
Sarah Michelle Gellar to TV as twins
Sarah Michelle Gellar fans will be seeing double when the actress returns to TV this year -- she has signed up to play twins in an edgy new show.
The former "Buffy The Vampire Slayer" star has stepped out of the spotlight over the last few years, taking a break to look after her daughter, Charlotte, her first child with husband Freddie Prinze, Jr. Charlotte was born in 2009.
Gellar is now set to make her small screen return in her first major TV role since her time on the vampire show came to an end back in 2003. She will take on two roles in new thriller "The Ringer," playing estranged twins with very different personalities.
The show's producer, Peter Traugott, tells EW.com, "It's an edgy thriller about redemption and about revenge. There's a point of view of two twin sisters who grew apart over a tragedy in their past. And one now seeks redemption and the other one seeks revenge. The sister who is seeking redemption has had a much more troubled life. When her fancy pants sister disappears, she takes over her life. She's living the life of her more successful sister only to come to find out that her life is equally as fraught with danger and complication. Her sister dies in a boating accident. The other sister takes on her persona, only to come to find out that they have a hit out on her."
Gellar will play both parts, with one sister appearing mostly in flashbacks.
SF Gate
Mission Viejo actress returns for movie premiere
Actress Kristy Swanson, a Mission Viejo native, returns to Orange County to attend the premeire of her latest movie "What if..." which opened Jan. 21 at the Rancho Niguel 8 in Laguna Niguel. Here, Swanson shares a laugh with the audience.
Actress Kristy Swanson, a native of Mission Viejo, returned to Orange County to attend the premiere of her latest movie "What if..." which opened last Friday at the Rancho Niguel 8 in Laguna Niguel.
Swanson, who starred in the movie "Buffy the Vampire Slayer," held a brief meet-and-greet prior to the show and followed up with autographs and discussion after the movie. Dozens of friends, family and well wishers attended the screening to support the actress.
OC Register
Marti Noxon Talks “Fright Night”
The Buffy The Vampire scribe was one of the writers on I AM NUMBER FOUR, which comes out February 18, but the film horror fans want to hear her chat about is FRIGHT NIGHT. Noxon scripted the remake, which comes out August 19 and stars Anton Yelchin, Colin Farrell, David Tenant and Christopher Mintz-Plasse.
Collider spoke with Noxon, a writer and producer who works in both film and television, and here are a few of the things she had to say about FRIGHT NIGHT.
When Noxon was offered the scripting chores, a pair of jumping off points got her rolling on the redux. “Yeah, there were two things,” she says. “One was that I’d been thinking about Vegas for a setting for a while, for a supernatural story. Because of the mortgage crisis, in some of those suburbs out there, every third or fourth house is vacant and it has this really eerie, ghost town feel. And then, on top of that, I was like, ‘God, if I were a vampire, nobody would know because everybody sleeps during the day and works at night. This would just be an awesome place for monsters!’ So, I had already started rolling that around in my head. It gets really dark, and it’s a place for sin and excess, and people go missing a lot. I was like, ‘I wish I were a vampire. I would so move here!’ When I heard they were thinking about doing the remake, I immediately thought, ‘Well, that would be an awesome movie to set in Las Vegas.’ It has that Spielberg-ian, suburb vibe and that Amblin feeling to it. You’ve got that, superficially, but then underneath that, something is really wrong. That, I immediately went to.
“And then, the second thing was that I went back and looked at the original movie and was like, ‘Why are these guys [Charley and Evil Ed] friends? What happened there?’ They never explain it. It felt like there were just big things cut out. I thought there was stuff that was indicated, but not explored. So, a big part of the movie is the relationship between Charley Brewster [Yelchin] and Evil Ed [Mintz-Plasse]. Thematically, it definitely became a question of, ‘What kind of man do you want to be?’ Charley forsakes his old friendships ’cause he’s momentarily cool. That was a huge touchstone.”
OK, enough with the character-oriented stuff, how scary and gory is the film going to be? “It’s intense,” she replies. ”It has a lot of intense moments, but it’s not very gory. It’s pretty close to the original, but maybe a little bit scarier just ’cause it’s a little more grounded. It’s not quite as over-the-top."
Fangoria
Collider spoke with Noxon, a writer and producer who works in both film and television, and here are a few of the things she had to say about FRIGHT NIGHT.
When Noxon was offered the scripting chores, a pair of jumping off points got her rolling on the redux. “Yeah, there were two things,” she says. “One was that I’d been thinking about Vegas for a setting for a while, for a supernatural story. Because of the mortgage crisis, in some of those suburbs out there, every third or fourth house is vacant and it has this really eerie, ghost town feel. And then, on top of that, I was like, ‘God, if I were a vampire, nobody would know because everybody sleeps during the day and works at night. This would just be an awesome place for monsters!’ So, I had already started rolling that around in my head. It gets really dark, and it’s a place for sin and excess, and people go missing a lot. I was like, ‘I wish I were a vampire. I would so move here!’ When I heard they were thinking about doing the remake, I immediately thought, ‘Well, that would be an awesome movie to set in Las Vegas.’ It has that Spielberg-ian, suburb vibe and that Amblin feeling to it. You’ve got that, superficially, but then underneath that, something is really wrong. That, I immediately went to.
“And then, the second thing was that I went back and looked at the original movie and was like, ‘Why are these guys [Charley and Evil Ed] friends? What happened there?’ They never explain it. It felt like there were just big things cut out. I thought there was stuff that was indicated, but not explored. So, a big part of the movie is the relationship between Charley Brewster [Yelchin] and Evil Ed [Mintz-Plasse]. Thematically, it definitely became a question of, ‘What kind of man do you want to be?’ Charley forsakes his old friendships ’cause he’s momentarily cool. That was a huge touchstone.”
OK, enough with the character-oriented stuff, how scary and gory is the film going to be? “It’s intense,” she replies. ”It has a lot of intense moments, but it’s not very gory. It’s pretty close to the original, but maybe a little bit scarier just ’cause it’s a little more grounded. It’s not quite as over-the-top."
Fangoria
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
Sarah Michelle Gellar - Sarah Michelle Gellar Could Return To Play Twin Sisters
26 January 2011
Sarah Michelle Gellar, the American actress best known for appearing in the long running drama series 'Buffy The Vampire Slayer', could return to television to play twin sisters in a new Cbs show titled 'Ringer', reports Entertainment Weekly. The show is currently in development and a pilot episode is expected to be filmed in May.
Although Gellar has been cast in the show, the drama is yet to be commissioned and a decision will be made after the pilot episode airs later this year. The actress was expected to appear in the much-anticipated Hbo series 'The Wonderful Maladys', but the show never made it past the pilot stage. Producer PETER TRAUGOTT confirmed that the "edgy thriller" will follow the story of two twin sisters who grow apart over a tragedy in their past. He also confirmed that Gellar would play the role of both twin sisters and added, "The sister who is seeking redemption has had a much more troubled life. When her fancy pants sister disappears, she takes over her life. She's living the life of her more successful sister".
The actress has struggled to land major roles since leaving 'Buffy' and her last television role came when she voiced a character on the animated series "American Dad' last year. In 2009, she appeared in the straight-to-dvd movie titled 'Veronika Decides to Die'.
Contact Music
Tuesday, January 25, 2011
Joss Whedon talks about the end of the 'Buffy the Vampire Slayer' Season 8 comic, and the future of Season 9
by Adam B. Vary
The acclaimed (oc)cult TV show Buffy the Vampire Slayer went off the air in 2003 after seven seasons. But for nearly four years, Buffy’s story has lived on in creator Joss Whedon’s “Season 8″ comic book series, which finishes its 40-issue run today. Whoa, boy, did things go down. (WARNING: Some big time spoilers follow, for both “Season 8″ and the impending “Season 9.” Consider yourself warned now.) Over the course of the “season,” Buffy became a god, battled (and boinked) her ex Angel, and watched him kill her mentor Giles. And then she effectively destroyed the seed of all magic on earth. Issue No. 40 deals with the aftermath, and — as Whedon makes clear in his exclusive Q&A with EW — it also gives some pointed hints for what to expect in Buffy “Season 9.” Whedon also talks about his new comic series about Angel with publisher Dark Horse, some of his controversial plot turns in “Season 8″ — Buffy goes lesbian? Xander and Dawn get domestic? — and what actor Anthony Stewart Head’s reaction was when Whedon told him his character Rupert Giles was going to bite the big one.
ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY: So no more magic, huh?
JOSS WHEDON: [Chuckles] Well, let’s not use hyperbole. No more magic in the sense of not so much entirely convenient magic. I wanted to play with the idea of the world dimming a little bit. Possibly because that’s how I feel about it, or at least this country in the last 10 years. And I wanted to do a little bit of a reset, where things seem more back down to earth. I got very excited when I had a comic book with the idea that I could do absolutely anything. We hit a lot of beautiful notes and I’ve got a lot of great writers working [on the comics], and I’m very proud of it. But at the same time, it’s like, yeah, “You can do anything” is not really the Buffy mission statement. The Buffy mission statement is, “What does this feel like?” So I wanted to bounce it back a little bit to the real world.
Issue No. 40 is clearly setting up Season 9, and makes it seem like it is going to be far more human-scaled.
It will be more like the television show. With the comic, we just sort of said, “Wheee!” Ultimately, “Wheee!” caught up with us in a cavalcade of mythology. It became clear, as it did with the show, that people really liked when Buffy’s adventures reflect what she’s going through in her life [and] what we’re going through in our lives at that age. That was the thing in season 8 that we didn’t tap into as much as I think we ultimately should have.
You did seem to touch on that idea when you, essentially, made Buffy a god with her own idyllic world, and she pretty much rejected it right off the bat.
Yeah. I feel like we’re true to the characters. It was just that very basic mission statement of, “You know what, I’m going through this, too.” Not a lot of people are leading armies. Buffy, part of her charm is that the fact that, outside the mystical world, she was nobody. And it was interesting to put her in that power position and to play on that grand scale. But ultimately, I think the fans more enjoy her when she is the little underdog and not the little overlord.
Not that anybody who’s a Buffy fan should be that shocked that you did this at this point, but Joss, you killed Giles.
Yeah, I did. I did. I have several reasons for that, some of which I can’t reveal because ripples from that event are going to be a part of both [the Buffy "Season 9" comic and the new Angel comic]. Part of it was really just feeling that Giles’ place in the comic book did not sit the way it did in the show. To have this paternal, expositional guy there — it wasn’t really something that played in the comics the way it did when Tony Head [i.e. actor Anthony Stewart Head] does it. I wanted to make all this matter and have something that would send emotional ripples through all the characters. Also, I’m a prick. But I did tell Tony it was going to happen before it did. At first he said, “Oooh,” a little worried. Then I said, “Angel’s gonna kill you.” He said, all excited, “Oooh! That’s great!” [Laughs]
Perhaps the other most controversial choice you made was to enter Buffy into a lesbian relationship. For some fans, that did seem to come oddly out of left field.
You know, I didn’t hear any real objection to that. But I don’t go trolling on websites for people that don’t like me. I’m very fragile, like an egg. We had talked about the idea of Buffy having a lesbian fling as one of the things that does actually reflect where she is in her life, if you consider the events in “Season 8″ to be her college experience. It’s that time in your life where that might happen. We just slammed right into it with a splash page, instead of tenuously inching towards it. And that was largely [writer] Drew Goddard’s call. He said, “You know what? It would obvious to start building toward this, and then seeing that play out, how that would be. I think in a lot of these situations, it just kind of happens, and then you deal with it.” It’s more interesting and it gives us a better opportunity to face the reality of a situation like that.
You also had Xander and Dawn ultimately become a romantic item, and you outed vampires to the world. It seems like you wanted to advance the story in a really meaningful, significant way on a lot of fronts.
You can’t just sit around and spin your wheel with these guys. The show lasted on the idea that people are constantly changing. What makes them interesting? So, is Willow destined to go dark? How is that future going to unfold? Who is in love with whom? Who can’t be with whom? That’s part of what makes their interaction rich. It’s not just, “We’re clever and funny, the murder is solved.” It’s just not the way I write. It was still very clear to me that Xander and Dawn were going to end up together by the very start [of Season 8]. And actually, I was surprised that anybody was surprised. All their interactions were so tight, and occasionally weirdly physical. It was all pointing there. He tried to have a relationship with somebody else, but some prick killed her.
You mentioned earlier about getting into a bit of trouble thanks to the freedom that comic books afforded you. But what was your favorite “We could never do this on the TV show” moment?
I gotta go with giant Dawn. I loved giant Dawn so much, absolutely more than the readers, but I didn’t care. The idea that Dawn becomes a giant and all the permutations of that, some of which we didn’t even get to do, that was such a delight for me. It just absolutely fit in the universe. It was the right kind of problem for Dawn to have.
On the penultimate page of issue No. 40, there’s a guy in John Lennon glasses who looks fairly evil. Am I right in thinking he’s new? Or am I just not remembering him from season 8?
He’s a new guy. I can’t tell you about him. But you are not wrong to say you don’t remember him, because he has not appeared yet. He has yet to come.
In the Fray storyline from “Season 8″ — in which Buffy got sucked into the world of your spin-off comic about a slayer living far into the future — we met Dark Willow again, and we seem to be heading in that direction the way we left Willow at the end of “Season 8.”
Well, maybe. It’s a question we’re holding out there right now: Is that her destiny? Can she get her powers back? This idea of magic being taken out of the world — that’s going to be her personal obsession and will result in a miniseries. She can have center stage for a while. Whether or not that means that’ll send her to become the evil Fray’d version of herself is something we’re going to dangle.
Finally, all due respect to the amazing artists who drew the comic and did the covers, but do you ever miss having the actors to bring these stories to life?
I do. Particularly, as I said before, in the case of Giles. Tony has this cool sexuality that just doesn’t come on the page when he’s saying, [in a British accent] “Oh, this book says blah blah blah.” It’s hard to capture some of the stuff that the actors bring. Tony is astonishing. I can’t speak highly enough of how artist Georges Jeanty captured their likenesses, but still made it look like a comic book and not like balloon heads on hastily drawn panels. And the way he captured Buffy was really lovely. But yeah, you hear [the characters] so well, sometimes it’s like they’re there. It is frustrating at times. You’re like, “Why can’t they just be there? Let’s get the whole gang back together again.”
For more on Joss Whedon and the future of the Buffyverse — including how Whedon really feels about the recently announced plans for a Buffy reboot movie without his involvement — check out this week’s issue of Entertainment Weekly, on newsstands Friday, Jan. 21.
Shelf Life
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




